Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31439067›Full record

ArticleEpidemiology and infection2019

Hospitalisation by tick-borne diseases in the last 10 years in two hospitals in South Spain: analysis of tick exposure data collected in the Emergency Department.

M Rivera-Izquierdo, L M Martín-delosReyes, A J Láinez-Ramos-Bossini, P Ruiz-Díaz, E Casado-Fernández, A Bueno-Cavanillas, V Martínez-Ruiz

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Epidemiology and infection, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 51% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

M Rivera-IzquierdoService of Preventive Medicine, Hospital Clínico San Cecilio, Granada.ORCID 0000-0001-6159-6037
L M Martín-delosReyesDepartment of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, University of Granada, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-2163-354X
A J Láinez-Ramos-BossiniDepartment of Radiology, Hospital Virgen de las Nieves, Granada.
P Ruiz-DíazService of Documentation, Hospital Clínico San Cecilio, Granada.
E Casado-FernándezService of Documentation, Hospital Clínico San Cecilio, Granada.
A Bueno-CavanillasService of Preventive Medicine, Hospital Clínico San Cecilio, Granada.
V Martínez-RuizDepartment of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, University of Granada, Spain.
Universidad de Granada · ESInstituto de Investigación Biosanitaria de Granada · ESHospital Universitario Virgen de las Nieves · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tick-borne diseases (TBDs) can sometimes cause severe symptoms and lead to hospitalisation, but they often go unnoticed in the Emergency Department (ED). The aim of this study was twofold: (i) to describe the profile of patients hospitalised by TBDs; and (ii) to evaluate the data collected in the medical records from the ED in order to analyse their potential clinical consequences. A total of 84 cases that included all TBD diagnoses registered in the ED records were identified and analysed. These corresponded to all the hospitalisations by TBDs in the last 10 years (2009-2019) in two tertiary hospitals in Granada, Spain. Statistical analyses were made using RStudio. Coinciding with the absence of patient's report of exposure to ticks, 64.3% of TBDs were not suspected in the ED. Intensive care unit admission was required in 8.3% of cases, and the mortality rate was 2.4%. Non-suspected cases showed longer hospital stay (P < 0.001), treatment duration (P = 0.02) and delay in the initiation of antibiotic treatment (P < 0.001). Our findings indicate that symptoms associated with TBDs are highly non-specific. In the absence of explicit information related to potential tick exposure, TBDs are not initially suspected. As a consequence, elective treatment administration is delayed and hospitalisation time is prolonged. In conclusion, our results highlight the importance of addressing potential exposure to ticks during the ED contact with patients presenting with febrile syndrome.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overCritical CareFemaleHospitalizationHumansMaleMiddle AgedSpainSurvival AnalysisTertiary Care CentersTick-Borne DiseasesEmergency Departmentepidemiologytick-borne diseasesticks

Identifiers

PMID31439067
PMCPMC6805758
OpenAlexW2969961712

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.