Observational studyBMC pediatrics2019
Poor oral habits and malocclusions after usage of orthodontic pacifiers: an observational study on 3-5 years old children.
Observational study in BMC pediatrics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Effectiveness of Myobrace Therapy in Correcting Anterior Crossbite in Early Mixed Dentition: A Retrospective Study.International journal of clinical pediatric dentistry · 2025Article
- Effect of different pacifier designs on orofacial tissues: a computational simulation comparative study.Clinical oral investigations · 2025Article
- Analysis of Google users' interests in information about pacifiers: an ecological digital study.European archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry · 2025Article
- Dietary and complementary oral supplements for the management of chronic diseases in children: a systematic review.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2025Review
- Influence of the Physiological Pacifier on the Development of Malocclusions in Children: A Scoping Review.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Investigation of Malocclusion and Associated Factors in Preschoolers: A Cross-Sectional Questionnaire Study.Epidemiologia (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Oral Habits in Childhood and Occlusal Pathologies: A Cohort Study.Clinics and practice · 2024Article
- Effects of Froggy Mouth Appliance in Pediatric Patients with Atypical Swallowing: A Prospective Study.Dentistry journal · 2024Article
- Observation of factors associated with visceral swallowing pattern in 2-6 year old children: A cross-sectional study.The Saudi dental journal · 2024Article
- Early Interceptive Correction for Anterior Crossbite Using a Removable Appliance: A Pediatric Case Study.Cureus · 2024Article
- Mouth Breathing and Its Impact on Atypical Swallowing: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Dentistry journal · 2024Review
- Incompetent lip seal and nail biting as risk factors for malocclusion in Japanese preschool children aged 3-6 years.BMC pediatrics · 2023Article
- Mentorship Programs in Residency: A Scoping Review.Journal of graduate medical education · 2023Article
- Oral Manifestations in Children Diagnosed with COVID-19: A Narrative Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- A new technology for pacifier weaning: a thematic analysis.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2023Article
- What Do Mothers (or Caregivers) Know about Their Children's Oral Hygiene? An Update of the Current Evidence.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Short-Term Effects of a Myofunctional Appliance on Atypical Swallowing and Lip Strength: A Prospective Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2020Article
- Prevalence of Caries and Associated Risk Factors in a Representative Group of Preschool Children from an Urban Area with High Income in Milan Province, Italy.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPacifier sucking habit has been associated in the literature with alterations of dental occlusion, and it could be a predisposing factor for other poor oral habits among children. Orthodontic pacifiers have been introduced in the market aiming to reduce these disadvantages caused by the conventional type of pacifiers. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of poor oral habits and malocclusions, after usage of orthodontic pacifiers in children with primary dentition.
methodsA sample of 198 pre-school children, aged 3-5 years, (96 males and 102 females) who had exclusively used an orthodontic pacifier were included in order to assess the level of poor oral habits and the absence/presence of dental malocclusion. Firstly, children's parents/legal guardians were given a validated questionnaire, then the children were clinically examined at a dental clinic.
resultsMost of the children (79.79%) had started using the orthodontic pacifier within the first 3 months of life, and the 43.49% of them continued using it over a period of 2 years. The recorded percentage for those who had used it throughout sleep was 89.39%. Mouth breathing during the night was reported for 36.04% of the children. Tongue thrust swallow affected 16.16% of the sample. The 5.56% of the data indicated the presence of fingersucking/thumbsucking habit. The noted percentages for children with lip biting, lingual interposition between teeth at rest and those with nail biting, were 5.56, 12.63 and 15.15%, respectively. The regression revealed a significant contribution between early start of using an orthodontic pacifier with the prevalence of fingersucking/thumbsucking (OR 0.13, 95% CI 0.04-0.47, p = 0.0004). This also reported a noticeable increase of the malocclusion prevalence among the female gender (OR 2.74, 95% CI 1.42-5.31), as well as those who were not exclusively breastfed (OR 2.26, 95% CI 1.17-4.37).
conclusionsOrthodontic pacifiers does not favor the development of poor oral habits, even if it has been used for a period of 2 years in children with primary dentition. Children who begin to use orthodontic pacifier between 0 and 3 months, are less likely to acquire fingersucking/thumbsucking habit. The use of an orthodontic pacifier appears not to be correlated with the prevalence of malocclusion in primary dentition, differently from what stated in literature about the conventional type of pacifier.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.