Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31438867›Full record

Observational studyBMC geriatrics2019

Applying a new concept of embedding qualitative research: an example from a quantitative study of carers of people in later stage dementia.

Michele Abendstern, Karen Davies, Helen Chester, Paul Clarkson, Jane Hughes, Caroline Sutcliffe, Fiona Poland, David Challis

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC geriatrics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Michele AbendsternPersonal Social Services Research Unit, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK. michele.abendstern@manchester.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-8672-7387
Karen DaviesPersonal Social Services Research Unit, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Helen ChesterSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Paul ClarksonPersonal Social Services Research Unit, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Jane HughesFormerly Personal Social Services Research Unit, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Caroline SutcliffePersonal Social Services Research Unit, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Fiona PolandSchool of Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.
David ChallisInstitute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
University of Manchester · GBUniversity of East Anglia · GBUniversity of Nottingham · GB

Funding

Department of Health DTC-RP-PG-0311-12003School for Social Care Research DTC-RP-PG-0311-12003
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundQualitative methods are increasingly included in larger studies to provide a richer understanding of people's experience. This paper explores the potential of using a novel approach to embedded qualitative design as part of an observational study examining the effectiveness of home support for people in later stage dementia in England. The method involved collecting and analysing unsolicited conversational comments made by participants as they completed standardised measures. An evaluation of the method is presented using the voices of participants to illustrate its potential.

methodsThe conversations of 17 carers recruited to an observational study were audio recorded to gather commentary made while completing a structured interview. Data were interrogated using thematic analysis to investigate the feasibility of conducting an embedded qualitative study, the potential richness of the material and participants' reactions to formal questioning and participating in research.

resultsThe findings revealed that qualitative data were available from this approach. Analysis generated three themes from carers: conflicting carer emotions; the importance of maintaining normality and agency within day-to-day life; and tensions between these desires and making use of formal services. Important issues for carers were revealed establishing the benefit of using the method. The advantages of exploiting unsolicited conversation included enhancing understanding of people's lived experience, reducing participant burden in research and easing the process of data collection. In addition, it provided an opportunity to evaluate individuals' experience of the research process.

conclusionsThe findings demonstrate how unsolicited comments during structured interviews may appear incidental but can reveal important aspects of living with dementia. The method also emphasised methodological challenges for research in dementia, including the influence and impact of the research context. Further research is required to evaluate the method with other groups including people with dementia themselves.

Indexed as

Qualitative ResearchAgedCaregiversDementiaFemaleHumansMaleCarersDementiaEmbedded studyExpressed experiencesQualitative methods

Identifiers

PMID31438867
PMCPMC6704652
OpenAlexW2968990598

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.