ArticleBMC bioinformatics2019
Influence of batch effect correction methods on drug induced differential gene expression profiles.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Harnessing AI to fuse phenotypic signatures for drug target identification: progress in computational modeling.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Review
- A deep single cell mass cytometry approach to capture canonical and noncanonical cell cycle states.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Assessing and mitigating batch effects in large-scale omics studies.Genome biology · 2024Review
- Using Transcriptomics and Cell Morphology Data in Drug Discovery: The Long Road to Practice.ACS medicinal chemistry letters · 2023Review
- Expression Analysis in a Dispersal-Fecundity Polyphenism Identifies Growth Regulators and Effectors.Integrative and comparative biology · 2022Article
- Identification of Critical Genes and Pathways for Influenza A Virus Infections via Bioinformatics Analysis.Viruses · 2022Article
- Integrative Pan-Cancer Analysis Reveals Decreased Melatonergic Gene Expression in Carcinogenesis andFrontiers in oncology · 2021Article
- Predicting mechanism of action of cellular perturbations with pathway activity signatures.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2020Article
- Knowledge Generation with Rule Induction in Cancer Omics.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBatch effects were not accounted for in most of the studies of computational drug repositioning based on gene expression signatures. It is unknown how batch effect removal methods impact the results of signature-based drug repositioning. Herein, we conducted differential analyses on the Connectivity Map (CMAP) database using several batch effect correction methods to evaluate the influence of batch effect correction methods on computational drug repositioning using microarray data and compare several batch effect correction methods.
resultsDifferences in average signature size were observed with different methods applied. The gene signatures identified by the Latent Effect Adjustment after Primary Projection (LEAPP) method and the methods fitted with Linear Models for Microarray Data (limma) software demonstrated little agreement. The external validity of the gene signatures was evaluated by connectivity mapping between the CMAP database and the Library of Integrated Network-based Cellular Signatures (LINCS) database. The results of connectivity mapping indicate that the genes identified were not reliable for drugs with total sample size (drug + control samples) smaller than 40, irrespective of the batch effect correction method applied. With total sample size larger than 40, the methods correcting for batch effects produced significantly better results than the method with no batch effect correction. In a simulation study, the power was generally low for simulated data with sample size smaller than 40. We observed best performance when using the limma method correcting for two principal components.
conclusionBatch effect correction methods strongly impact differential gene expression analysis when the sample size is large enough to contain sufficient information and thus the downstream drug repositioning. We recommend including two or three principal components as covariates in fitting models with limma when sample size is sufficient (larger than 40 drug and controls combined).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.