ArticlePhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2019
Cooking up the perfect insect: Aristotle's transformational idea about the complete metamorphosis of insects.
Article in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Optogenetic control of transition to metamorphosis.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026Article
- Rapid growth and the evolution of complete metamorphosis in insects.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024Article
- The making of a maggot brain.eLife · 2023Article
- A transcription factor that enables metamorphosis.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022Article
- Antipredator strategies of pupae: how to avoid predation in an immobile life stage?Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2019Review
- The evolution of insect metamorphosis: a developmental and endocrine view.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2019Article
- Complete metamorphosis of insects.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aristotle made important contributions to the study of developmental biology, including the complete metamorphosis of insects. One concept in particular, that of the perfect or complete state, underlies Aristotle's ideas about metamorphosis, the necessity of fertilization for embryonic development, and whether morphogenesis involves an autonomous process of self-assembly. Importantly, the philosopher erroneously views metamorphosis as a necessary developmental response to lack of previous fertilization of the female parent, a view that is intimately connected with his readiness to accept the idea of the spontaneous generation of life. Aristotle's work underpins that of the major seventeenth century students of metamorphosis, Harvey, Redi, Malpighi and Swammerdam, all of whom make frequent reference to Aristotle in their writings. Although both Aristotle and Harvey are often credited with inspiring the later prolonged debate between proponents of epigenesis and preformation, neither actually held firm views on the subject. Aristotle's idea of the perfect stage also underlies his proposal that the eggs of holometabolous insects hatch 'before their time', an idea that is the direct precursor of the much later proposals by Lubbock and Berlese that the larval stages of holometabolous insects are due to the 'premature hatching' from the egg of an imperfect embryonic stage. This article is part of the theme issue 'The evolution of complete metamorphosis'.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.