Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31438520›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2019

Agreement Analysis between Vive and Vicon Systems to Monitor Lumbar Postural Changes.

Susanne M van der Veen, Martine Bordeleau, Peter E Pidcoe, Chris R France, James S Thomas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Susanne M van der VeenDepartment of Physical TherapyVirginia Commonwealth University, MCV Campus, Richmond, VA 23220, USA. smvanderveen@vcu.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-2799-6816
Martine BordeleauDepartment of Neuroscience, Université Laval, Québec, QC G1V 4G2, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-5908-9068
Peter E PidcoeDepartment of Physical TherapyVirginia Commonwealth University, MCV Campus, Richmond, VA 23220, USA.
Chris R FranceDepartment of Psychology, Ohio University, College of Arts & Sciences, Athens, OH 45701, USA.
James S ThomasDepartment of Physical TherapyVirginia Commonwealth University, MCV Campus, Richmond, VA 23220, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Immersive virtual reality has recently developed into a readily available system that allows for full-body tracking. Can this affordable system be used for component tracking to advance or replace expensive kinematic systems for motion analysis in the clinic? The aim of this study was to assess the accuracy of position and orientation measures from Vive wireless body trackers when compared to Vicon optoelectronic tracked markers attached to (1) a robot simulating trunk flexion and rotation by repeatedly moving to know locations, and (2) healthy adults playing virtual reality games necessitating significant trunk displacements. The comparison of both systems showed component tracking with Vive trackers is accurate within 0.68 ± 0.32 cm translationally and 1.64 ± 0.18° rotationally when compared with a three-dimensional motion capture system. No significant differences between Vive trackers and Vicon systems were found suggesting the Vive wireless sensors can be used to accurately track joint motion for clinical and research data.

Indexed as

agreement analysismotion captureViconvirtual realityVive

Identifiers

PMID31438520
PMCPMC6749183

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.