ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2019
Experimental and Computational Methodology for the Determination of Hydrodynamic Coefficients Based on Free Decay Test: Application to Conception and Control of Underwater Robots.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Non-Parametric Kinematic Optimization of Flapping Foil Propulsion Using a Discrete Adjoint Method.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- A Simple Approach to Estimate the Drag Coefficients of a Submerged Floater.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Control Strategy of an Underactuated Underwater Drone-Shape Robot for Grasping Tasks.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Fiber Bragg Grating Sensors for Underwater Vibration Measurement: Potential Hydropower Applications.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Mini-AUV Hydrodynamic Parameters Identification via CFD Simulations and Their Application on Control Performance Evaluation.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Design and Construction of an ROV for Underwater Exploration.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hydrodynamic coefficients are essential for the development of underwater robots; in particular, for their design and navigation control. To obtain these coefficients, several techniques exist. These methods are usually experimental, but, more recently, some have been designed by a combination of experiments with computational methods based on Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD). One method for obtaining the hydrodynamic coefficients of an ROV (Remote Operated Vehicle) is by using an experimental PMM (Planar Motion Mechanism) or CWC (Circular Water Channel); however, the use of these experimental infrastructures is costly. Therefore, it is of interest to obtain these coefficients in other ways, for example, by the use of simple experiments. The Free Decay Test is an ideal type of experiment, as it has a low cost and is simple to implement. In this paper, two different free decay tests were carried out, to which three different methods for obtaining coefficients were applied. They were compared with results obtained by CFD simulation to conduct a statistical analysis in order to determine their behaviours. It was possible to obtain values of the drag and added mass coefficients for the models analysed, where the values were obtained for an Underwater Drone Robot (UDrobot).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.