ArticleStudies in health technology and informatics2019
Improving Patient Participation in Cancer Clinical Trials: A Qualitative Analysis of HSRProj & RePORTER.
Article in Studies in health technology and informatics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Formative Evaluation of Interventions to Enhance Clinical Trial Diversity Guided by the Socioecological Model.Cancers · 2025Article
- Deciding to Enrol in a Cancer Trial: A Systematic Review of Qualitative Studies.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Enrollment and representativeness, in cancer trials, have been a problem resulting in studies with poor generalizability to the real-world population. This study uses qualitative analysis of two publicly available datasets (HSRProj and RePORTER) to explore funded research projects, which employ strategies at the macro, meso, and micro levels. Our research shows that although the number of projects designed to increase participation in cancer clinical trials peaked in the 2000s, most employ a single level strategy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.