Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31438148›Full record

ArticleStudies in health technology and informatics2019

Perceptions and Preferences About Granular Data Sharing and Privacy of Behavioral Health Patients.

Hiral Soni, Adela Grando, Marcela P Aliste, Anita Murcko, Michael Todd, Madhumita Mukundan, Michael Saks, Caroline Horrow, Richard Sharp, Christy Dye and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Studies in health technology and informatics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Pilot evaluation of sensitive data segmentation technology for privacy.International journal of medical informatics · 2020
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Hiral SoniDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Arizona State University, Scottsdale, US.
Adela GrandoDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Arizona State University, Scottsdale, US.
Marcela P AlisteDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Arizona State University, Scottsdale, US.
Anita MurckoDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Arizona State University, Scottsdale, US.
Michael ToddCollege of Nursing and Health Innovation, Arizona State University, Phoenix, US.
Madhumita MukundanDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Arizona State University, Scottsdale, US.
Michael SaksSandra Day O'Connor College of Law, Arizona State University, Phoenix, US.
Caroline HorrowBiomedical Ethics Research Program, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, US.
Richard SharpBiomedical Ethics Research Program, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, US.
Christy DyePartners in Recovery, Phoenix, US.
Darwyn ChernPartners in Recovery, Phoenix, US.
Mary Jo WhitfieldJewish Family and Children's Services, Phoenix, US.
Mark CallesenJewish Family and Children's Services, Phoenix, US.

Funding

My Data Choices, evaluation of effective consent strategies for patients with behavioral health conditionsR01MH108992 · NIMH · ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY-TEMPE CAMPUS · PI GRANDO, MARIA ADELA · 2016 to 2020
$2.0M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH108992
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Little is known about data sharing preferences for care and research of behavioral health patients. Eighty-six behavioral health patients (n = 37 Latinos; n = 32 with serious mental illness) completed questionnaires, in either English or Spanish, with items assessing their views on privacy and sensitivity of health record information. Most patients (82.5%) considered mental health information as sensitive. In general, there was a direct correspondence between perceived sensitivity of information and willingness to share with all or some providers. A main motivation for sharing data with providers was improving the patient's own care (77.8%). Most participants (96.5%) indicated they would be extremely to somewhat willing to share their data for research with their care facilities and universities. Follow-up patient interviews are being conducted to further elucidate these findings.

Indexed as

Information DisseminationPrivacyConfidentialityElectronic Health RecordsHumansSurveys and QuestionnairesElectronic Health RecordsPrivacySurveys

Identifiers

PMID31438148
PMCPMC11908438

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.