ArticleStudies in health technology and informatics2019
Evaluating the Scope of Clinical Electronic Messaging to Coordinate Care in a Breast Cancer Cohort.
Article in Studies in health technology and informatics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Networked Behaviors Associated With a Large-Scale Secure Messaging Network: Cross-Sectional Secondary Data Analysis.JMIR medical informatics · 2025Article
- Prioritizing Patient-Centered Care in a World of Increasingly Advanced Technologies and Disconnected Care.Seminars in radiation oncology · 2024Review
- Exploring the use of social network analysis methods in process improvement within healthcare organizations: a scoping review.BMC health services research · 2024Article
- Characterizing the Patterns of Electronic Health Record-Integrated Secure Messaging Use: Cross-Sectional Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2023Observational
- Using event logs to observe interactions with electronic health records: an updated scoping review shows increasing use of vendor-derived measures.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2022Article
- An Analysis of Electronic Health Record Work to Manage Asynchronous Clinical Messages among Breast Cancer Care Teams.Applied clinical informatics · 2021Article
- Classification and analysis of asynchronous communication content between care team members involved in breast cancer treatment.JAMIA open · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Care coordination has received attention as an opportunity to improve healthcare delivery. Current work to quantify provider coordination has primarily relied on identifying shared patients, but neglects to understand communication patterns. We applied social network analysis to electronic health record (EHR) secure messaging data to compare networks of providers who share patients and networks of providers who communicate about patients. We studied 2175 stage I-III breast cancer patients who received outpatient treatment from 1758 providers at a large academic medical center in the southeastern United States. Patients in our cohort were involved in 94324 appointments and were the subject of 307144 message threads. We found that 9.9% of provider-provider pairs that shared patients were mutually involved in electronic communication about their patients. EHR data sources can be used to evaluate provider communication across a clinical enterprise, which can help identify opportunities to improve collaboration and reduce provider burnout.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.