Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31437618›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of medical informatics2019

Designing for engagement with self-monitoring: A user-centered approach with low-income, Latino adults with Type 2 Diabetes.

Meghan Reading Turchioe, Elizabeth M Heitkemper, Maichou Lor, Marissa Burgermaster, Lena Mamykina

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of medical informatics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. T2 Coach: A Qualitative Study of an Automated Health Coach for Diabetes Self-Management.Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. CHI Conference
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Meghan Reading TurchioeDivision of Health Informatics, Department of Healthcare Policy and Research, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, United States. Electronic address: mjr2011@med.cornell.edu.
Elizabeth M HeitkemperDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States.
Maichou LorSchool of Nursing, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States.
Marissa BurgermasterDepartment of Nutritional Sciences, College of Natural Sciences & Department of Population Health, Dell Medical School, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, United States.
Lena MamykinaDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States.

Funding

Training in Biomedical Informatics at Columbia UniversityT15LM007079 · NLM · COLUMBIA UNIV NEW YORK MORNINGSIDE · PI NOEMIE ELHADAD, GEORGE M HRIPCSAK · 1992 to 2026
$28.9M
Reducing Health Disparities Through Informatics - Genomics SupplementT32NR007969 · NINR · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI SUZANNE BAKKEN, Rebecca Schnall · 2002 to 2026
$7.9M
Reaching Communities through the Design of Information Visualizations (ReDIVis) Toolbox to Address COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy and Uptake.P30NR016587 · NINR · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI BAKKEN, SUZANNE, SMALDONE, ARLENE M · 2016 to 2022
$4.3M
NINR NIH HHS P30 NR016587NINR NIH HHS T32 NR007969NLM NIH HHS T15 LM007079
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and significanceData-driven interventions for health can help to personalize self-management of Type 2 Diabetes (T2D), but lack of sustained engagement with self-monitoring among disadvantaged populations may widen existing health disparities. Prior work developing approaches to increase motivation and engagement with self-monitoring holds promise, but little is known about applicability of these approaches to underserved populations.

objectiveTo explore how low-income, Latino adults with T2D respond to different design concepts for data-driven solutions in health that require self-monitoring, and what features resonate with them the most. MATERIAL AND

methodsWe developed a set of mockups that incorporated different design features for promoting engagement with self-monitoring in T2D. We conducted focus groups to examine individuals' perceptions and attitudes towards mockups. Multiple interdisciplinary researchers analyzed data using directed content analysis.

resultsWe conducted 14 focus groups with 25 English- and Spanish-speaking adults with T2D. All participants reacted positively to external incentives. Social connectedness and healthcare expert feedback were also well liked because they enhanced current social practices and presented opportunities for learning. However, attitudes were more mixed towards goal setting, and very few participants responded positively to self-discovery and personalized decision support features. Instead, participants wished for personalized recommendations for meals and other health behaviors based on their personal health data.

conclusionThis study suggests connections between individuals' degree of internal motivation and motivation for self-monitoring in health and their attitude towards designs of self-monitoring apps. We relate our findings to the self-determination continuum in self-determination theory (SDT) and propose it as a blueprint for aligning incentives for self-monitoring to different levels of motivation.

Indexed as

Health BehaviorMonitoring, PhysiologicMotivationAdultDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2FemaleFocus GroupsHispanic or LatinoHumansIncomeMaleMiddle AgedSelf CareYoung AdultChronic diseaseHealth behaviorHealthcare disparitiesInformaticsMobile health

Identifiers

PMID31437618
PMCPMC6746233

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.