Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31437278›Full record

ArticleGigaScience2019

Precision nomenclature for the new genomics.

Harris A Lewin, Jennifer A Marshall Graves, Oliver A Ryder, Alexander S Graphodatsky, Stephen J O'Brien

Open access · goldAbstract readLetter
In one paragraph

Article in GigaScience, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Conservation of chromatin conformation in carnivores.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Anchoring the CerEla1.0 Genome Assembly to Red Deer (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Harris A LewinDepartment of Evolution and Ecology and the UC Davis Genome Center, 4321 Genome and Biomedical Sciences Facility, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
Jennifer A Marshall GravesDepartment of Ecology, Environment and Evolution, School of Life Sciences, La Trobe University, Kingsbury Drive, Bundoora , Victoria 3086, Australia.
Oliver A RyderSan Diego Zoo Institute for Conservation Research, 15600 San Pasqual Valley Road, Escondido, CA 92027, USA.
Alexander S GraphodatskyInstitute of Molecular and Cellular Biology, SB RAS, Novosibirsk 630090, Russia.
Stephen J O'BrienTheodosius Dobzhansky Center for Genome Bioinformatics, St. Petersburg State University, St. Petersburg 194044, Russia.
La Trobe University · AUNovosibirsk State University · RUSan Diego Zoo Institute for Conservation Research · USSt Petersburg University · RUUniversity of California, Davis · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The confluence of two scientific disciplines may lead to nomenclature conflicts that require new terms while respecting historical definitions. This is the situation with the current state of cytology and genomics, which offer examples of distinct nomenclature and vocabularies that require reconciliation. In this article, we propose the new terms C-scaffold (for chromosome-scale assemblies of sequenced DNA fragments, commonly named scaffolds) and scaffotype (the resulting collection of C-scaffolds that represent an organism's genome). This nomenclature avoids conflict with the historical definitions of the terms chromosome (a microscopic body made of DNA and protein) and karyotype (the collection of images of all chromosomes of an organism or species). As large-scale sequencing projects progress, adoption of this nomenclature will assist end users to properly classify genome assemblies, thus facilitating genomic analysis.

Indexed as

GenomeGenomicsTerminology as TopicAnimalsHumans

Identifiers

PMID31437278
PMCPMC6705538
OpenAlexW2969710276

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.