ArticlePloS one2019
Baculovirus entire ORF1629 is not essential for viral replication.
Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Development of a 12-Valent HPV L1 Virus-like Particle Vaccine Using an Enhanced Baculovirus Expression System.Vaccines · 2026Article
- Construction of a Baculovirus Derivative to Produce Linearized Antheraea pernyi (Lepidoptera: Saturniidae) Multicapsid Nucleopolyhedrovirus Genomic DNA.Journal of insect science (Online) · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
It is generally accepted that ORF1629 is essential for baculovirus replication, which has enabled isolation of recombinant viruses in a baculovirus expression system using linearized viral DNA. ORF1629-defective viruses cannot replicate in insect cells; only recombinant virus with complete ORF1629 restoration by recombination can propagate, allowing for pure isolation and the development of bacmids for easy selection of recombinant viruses. We inadvertently found proliferation in insect cells of a bacmid lacking a complete ORF1629. PCR indicated no other viruses but a lack of complete ORF1629 in the proliferated bacmid, suggesting that the baculovirus propagated without a complete ORF1629. Lack of ORF1629 decreased the virus growth rate and yield; it also increased the occlusion body (OB) size but decreased its yield. These results were confirmed for Autographa californica multicapsid nucleopolyhedrovirus (AcMNPV) and Bombyx mori NPV (BmNPV). Thus, entire ORF1629 is not essential for viral replication, though it does affect the virus growth rate, yield, and size and OB production.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.