Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31437227›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Bone metabolism genes variation and response to bisphosphonate treatment in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis.

Pavel Marozik, Vidmantas Alekna, Ema Rudenko, Marija Tamulaitiene, Alena Rudenka, Asta Mastaviciute, Volha Samokhovec, Andrejus Cernovas, Katsiaryna Kobets, Irma Mosse

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Molecular and Cellular Mechanisms of Osteoporosis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Early-Onset Osteoporosis.Calcified tissue international · 2022
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Pavel MarozikLaboratory of Human Genetics, Institute of Genetics and Cytology of the National Academy of Sciences of Belarus, Minsk, Belarus.ORCID 0000-0002-5973-7870
Vidmantas AleknaFaculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania.
Ema RudenkoDepartment of Cardiology and Internal Diseases, Belarusian State Medical University, Minsk, Belarus.
Marija TamulaitieneFaculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania.
Alena RudenkaDepartment of Cardiology and Rheumatology, Belarusian Medical Academy of Post-Graduate Education, Minsk, Belarus.
Asta MastaviciuteFaculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania.
Volha SamokhovecDepartment of Cardiology and Rheumatology, Belarusian Medical Academy of Post-Graduate Education, Minsk, Belarus.
Andrejus CernovasFaculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania.
Katsiaryna KobetsLaboratory of Human Genetics, Institute of Genetics and Cytology of the National Academy of Sciences of Belarus, Minsk, Belarus.ORCID 0000-0001-5819-6745
Irma MosseLaboratory of Human Genetics, Institute of Genetics and Cytology of the National Academy of Sciences of Belarus, Minsk, Belarus.
Vilnius University · LTBelarusian Medical Academy of Post-Graduate Education · BYBelarusian State University · BYBelarusian State Medical University · BYInstitute of Genetics and Cytology of the National Academy of Sciences of Belarus · BY

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionLong-term treatment is used in patients with osteoporosis, and bisphosphonates (BPs) are the most commonly prescribed medications. However, in some patients this therapy is not effective, cause different side effects and complications. Unfortunately, at least one year is needed to identify and confirm an ineffectiveness of BPs therapy on bone mineral density (BMD). Among other factors, a response to BPs therapy may also be explained by genetic factors. The aim of this study was to analyze the influence of SOST, PTH, FGF2, FDPS, GGPS1, and LRP5 gene variants on the response to treatment with aminobisphosphonates. MATERIALS AND

methodsWomen with postmenopausal osteoporosis were included to this study if they used aminobisphosphonates for at least 12 months. Exclusion criteria were: persistence on BPs therapy less than 80%, bone metabolic diseases, diseases deemed to affect bone metabolism, malignant tumours, using of any medications influencing BMD. The study protocol was approved by the local ethics committee. The BMD at the lumbar spine and femoral neck were measured using dual x-ray absorptiometry (GE Lunar) before and at least 12 months after treatment with BPs. According to BMD change, patients were divided in two groups-responders and non-responders to BPs terapy. Polymorphic variants in SOST, PTH, FGF2, FDPS, GGPS1, and LRP5 genes were determined using PCR analysis with TaqMan probes (Thermo Scientific).

resultsIn total, 201 women with BPs therapy were included in the study. No statistically significant differences were observed in age, age at menopause, weight, height, BMI and baseline BMD levels between responders (122 subjects) and non-responders (79 subjects). As single markers, the SOST rs1234612 T/T (OR = 2.3; P = 0.02), PTH rs7125774 T/T (OR = 2.8, P = 0.0009), FDPS rs2297480 G/G (OR = 29.3, P = 2.2×10-7), and GGPS1 rs10925503 C/C+C/T (OR = 2.9; P = 0.003) gene variants were over-represented in non-responders group. No significant association between FGF2 rs6854081 and LRP5 rs3736228 gene variants and response to BPs treatment was observed. The carriers of T-T-G-C allelic combination (constructed from rs1234612, rs7125774, rs2297480, and rs10925503) were predisposed to negative response to BPs treatment (OR = 4.9, 95% CI 1.7-14.6, P = 0.005). The C-C-T-C combination was significantly over-represented in responders (OR = 0.1, 95% CI 0.1-0.5, P = 0.006).

conclusionsOur findings highlight the importance of identified single gene variants and their allelic combinations for pharmacogenetics of BPs therapy of osteoporosis. Complex screening of these genetic markers could be used as a new strategy for personalized antiresorptive therapy.

Indexed as

Genetic VariationAgedAllelesBone and BonesDiphosphonatesFemaleGene FrequencyHumansMiddle AgedOsteoporosis, PostmenopausalDiphosphonates

Identifiers

PMID31437227
PMCPMC6705789
OpenAlexW2969362972

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.