Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31437188›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Epidemiology and prognostic factors of nosocomial candidemia in Northeast Brazil: A six-year retrospective study.

Mariana Araújo Paulo de Medeiros, Ana Patrícia Vieira de Melo, Aurélio de Oliveira Bento, Luanda Bárbara Ferreira Canário de Souza, Francisco de Assis Bezerra Neto, Jarmilla Bow-Ltaif Garcia, Diana Luzia Zuza-Alves, Elaine Cristina Francisco, Analy Salles de Azevedo Melo, Guilherme Maranhão Chaves

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. The journal of venomous animals and toxins including tropical diseases · 2026
    Article
  7. Candidemia in a tertiary hospital in Southern Brazil.Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de Sao Paulo · 2026
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Azole Resistance andJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  10. Evaluation of Fifteen 5,6-Dihydrotetrazolo[1,5-Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Unresolved issues in the diagnosis of catheter related candidemia: A position paper.Revista espanola de quimioterapia : publicacion oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Quimioterapia · 2024
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. The Menace ofDiseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Systemic Infection by Non-Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  18. Pharmaceutics · 2021
    Review
  19. Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Mariana Araújo Paulo de MedeirosLaboratory of Medical and Molecular Mycology, Department of Clinical and Toxicological Analysis, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal city, Rio Grande do Norte State, Brazil.
Ana Patrícia Vieira de MeloLaboratory of Medical and Molecular Mycology, Department of Clinical and Toxicological Analysis, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal city, Rio Grande do Norte State, Brazil.
Aurélio de Oliveira BentoLaboratory of Medical and Molecular Mycology, Department of Clinical and Toxicological Analysis, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal city, Rio Grande do Norte State, Brazil.
Luanda Bárbara Ferreira Canário de SouzaLaboratory of Medical and Molecular Mycology, Department of Clinical and Toxicological Analysis, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal city, Rio Grande do Norte State, Brazil.
Francisco de Assis Bezerra NetoLaboratory of Medical and Molecular Mycology, Department of Clinical and Toxicological Analysis, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal city, Rio Grande do Norte State, Brazil.
Jarmilla Bow-Ltaif GarciaLaboratory of Medical and Molecular Mycology, Department of Clinical and Toxicological Analysis, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal city, Rio Grande do Norte State, Brazil.
Diana Luzia Zuza-AlvesLaboratory of Medical and Molecular Mycology, Department of Clinical and Toxicological Analysis, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal city, Rio Grande do Norte State, Brazil.
Elaine Cristina FranciscoSpecial Mycology Laboratory, Department of Medicine, Federal University of Sao Paulo, São Paulo City, São Paulo State, Brazil.
Analy Salles de Azevedo MeloSpecial Mycology Laboratory, Department of Medicine, Federal University of Sao Paulo, São Paulo City, São Paulo State, Brazil.
Guilherme Maranhão ChavesLaboratory of Medical and Molecular Mycology, Department of Clinical and Toxicological Analysis, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal city, Rio Grande do Norte State, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-0170-9383

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Candidemia has been considered a persistent public health problem with great impact on hospital costs and high mortality. We aimed to evaluate the epidemiology and prognostic factors of candidemia in a tertiary hospital in Northeast Brazil from January 2011 to December 2016. Demographic and clinical data of patients were retrospectively obtained from medical records and antifungal susceptibility profiling was performed using the broth microdilution method. A total of 68 episodes of candidemia were evaluated. We found an average incidence of 2.23 episodes /1000 admissions and a 30-day mortality rate of 55.9%. The most prevalent species were Candida albicans (35.3%), Candida tropicalis (27.4%), Candida parapsilosis (21.6%) and Candida glabrata (11.8%). Higher mortality rates were observed in cases of candidemia due to C. albicans (61.1%) and C. glabrata (100%), especially when compared to C. parapsilosis (27.3%). Univariate analysis revealed some variables which significantly increased the probability of death: older age (P = 0.022; odds ratio [OR] = 1.041), severe sepsis (P < 0.001; OR = 8.571), septic shock (P = 0.035; OR = 3.792), hypotension (P = 0.003; OR = 9.120), neutrophilia (P = 0.046; OR = 3.080), thrombocytopenia (P = 0.002; OR = 6.800), mechanical ventilation (P = 0.009; OR = 8.167) and greater number of surgeries (P = 0.037; OR = 1.920). Multivariate analysis showed that older age (P = 0.040; OR = 1.055), severe sepsis (P = 0.009; OR = 9.872) and hypotension (P = 0.031; OR = 21.042) were independently associated with worse prognosis. There was no resistance to amphotericin B, micafungin or itraconazole and a low rate of resistance to fluconazole (5.1%). However, 20.5% of the Candida isolates were susceptible dose-dependent (SDD) to fluconazole and 7.7% to itraconazole. In conclusion, our results could assist in the adoption of strategies to stratify patients at higher risk for developing candidemia and worse prognosis, in addition to improve antifungal management.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAge FactorsAnalysis of VarianceAntifungal AgentsBrazilCandida albicansCandida glabrataCandida parapsilosisCandida tropicalisCandidemiaCross InfectionDrug Resistance, FungalFemaleHumansHypertensionAntifungal Agents

Identifiers

PMID31437188
PMCPMC6705852

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.