Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31437167›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Bayesian factor analytic model: An approach in multiple environment trials.

Joel Jorge Nuvunga, Carlos Pereira da Silva, Luciano Antonio de Oliveira, Renato Ribeiro de Lima, Marcio Balestre

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. A framework for simulating genotype-by-environment interaction using multiplicative models.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2024
    Article
  3. Hierarchical modelling of variance components makes analysis of resolvable incomplete block designs more efficient.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2024
    Article
  4. GIS-FA: an approach to integrating thematic maps, factor-analytic, and envirotyping for cultivar targeting.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Joel Jorge NuvungaDepartment of Statistics (DES), Federal University of Lavras, Lavras, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Carlos Pereira da SilvaDepartment of Statistics (DES), Federal University of Lavras, Lavras, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Luciano Antonio de OliveiraDepartment of Statistics (DES), Federal University of Lavras, Lavras, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Renato Ribeiro de LimaDepartment of Statistics (DES), Federal University of Lavras, Lavras, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Marcio BalestreDepartment of Statistics (DES), Federal University of Lavras, Lavras, Minas Gerais, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-4829-455X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

One of the main challenges in plant breeding programs is the efficient quantification of the genotype-by-environment interaction (GEI). The presence of significant GEI may create difficulties for breeders in the selection and recommendation of superior genotypes for a wide environmental network. Among the diverse statistical procedures developed for this purpose, we highlight those based on mixed models and factor analysis that are called factor analytic (FA) models. However, some inferential issues are related to the factor analytic model, such as Heywood cases that make the model non-identifiable. Moreover, the representation of the loads and factors in the conventional biplot does not involve any measurement of uncertainty. In this work, we propose dealing with the FA model using the Bayesian framework with direct sampling of factor loadings via spectral decomposition; this guarantees identifiability in the estimation process and eliminates the need for the rotationality of factor loadings or imposition of any ad hoc constraints. We used simulated and real data to illustrate the method's application in multi-environment trials (MET) and to compare it with traditional FA mixed models on controlled unbalancing. In general, the Bayesian FA model was robust under different simulated unbalanced levels, presenting the superior predictive ability of missing data when compared to competing models, such as those based on FA mixed models. In addition, for some scenarios, the classical FA mixed model failed in estimating the full FA model, illustrating the parametric problems of convergence in these models. Our results suggest that Bayesian factorial models might be successfully used in plant breeding for MET analysis.

Indexed as

Gene-Environment InteractionModels, StatisticalBayes TheoremComputer SimulationEnvironmentFactor Analysis, StatisticalGenotypeModels, GeneticPlant BreedingPlants

Identifiers

PMID31437167
PMCPMC6705866

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.