Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31437004›Full record

ReviewThe British journal of radiology2020

Proton RBE dependence on dose in the setting of hypofractionation.

Thomas Friedrich

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The British journal of radiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05861245 (Phase II Clinical Trial of Low-intervention Using Hypofractionated Protontherapy in Chordomas and Chondrosarcomas of the Skull Base), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05861245 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Phase II Clinical Trial of Low-intervention Using Hypofractionated Protontherapy in Chordomas and Chondrosarcomas of the Skull Base

TypeinterventionalSponsorQuironsaludRan2023 to 2033Enrolled20ConditionsChordoma, ChondrosarcomaArms5-fraction hipofractionated protontheray, 25-fraction hypofractionated proton therapy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Treatment planning considerations for the development of FLASH proton therapy.Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology · 2022
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Proton therapy special feature: introductory editorial.The British journal of radiology · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Thomas FriedrichGSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung GmbH, Darmstadt, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hypofractionated radiotherapy is attractive concerning patient burden and therapy costs, but many aspects play a role when it comes to assess its safety. While exploited for conventional photon therapy and carbon ion therapy, hypofractionation with protons is only rarely applied. One reason for this is uncertainty in the described dose, mainly due to the relative biological effectiveness (RBE), which is small for protons, but not negligible. RBE is generally dose-dependent, and for higher doses as used in hypofractionation, a thorough RBE evaluation is needed. This review article focuses on the RBE variability in protons and associated issues or implications for hypofractionation.

Indexed as

Radiation Dose HypofractionationRelative Biological EffectivenessHeavy Ion RadiotherapyHumansProton TherapyRadiobiologyTreatment OutcomeUncertainty

Identifiers

PMID31437004
PMCPMC7066967

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.