Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31436631›Full record

ArticleOtology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology2019

Occipital and Cerebellar Theta Burst Stimulation for Mal De Debarquement Syndrome.

Yoon-Hee Cha, Diamond Gleghorn, Benjamin Doudican

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02470377 (Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Mal de Debarquement Syndrome), which is not on this map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02470377 nacompletednot on this map

Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Mal de Debarquement Syndrome

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of MinnesotaRan2015 to 2017Enrolled24ConditionsMal de Debarquement SyndromeArmsTranscranial Magnetic Stimulation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation Reduces Network Hypersynchrony and Persistent Vertigo.Neuromodulation : journal of the International Neuromodulation Society · 2021
    Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. A Brief History of Cerebellar Neurostimulation.Cerebellum (London, England) · 2022
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yoon-Hee ChaLaureate Institute for Brain Research.
Diamond GleghornLaureate Institute for Brain Research.
Benjamin DoudicanLaureate Institute for Brain Research.
Laureate Institute for Brain Research · US

Funding

The Center for Neuroscience-based Mental Health Assessment and Prediction (NEUROMAP)P20GM121312 · NIGMS · LAUREATE INSTITUTE FOR BRAIN RESEARCH · PI Maëlle Camille Marie Gueguen · 2017 to 2026
$23.7M
NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM121312
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIndividuals with Mal de Debarquement syndrome (MdDS) experience persistent oscillating vertigo lasting for months or years. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) can modulate the motion perception of MdDS. MATERIALS AND

methodsTwenty-six TMS naive individuals received single administrations of continuous theta burst stimulation (cTBS) over the occipital cortex, cerebellar vermis, and lateral cerebellar hemisphere, in randomized order. A 0-100 point Visual Analogue Scale was used to assess acute changes in oscillating vertigo severity after each session. Repeated treatments were given over the target that led to the most acute reduction in symptoms. All treatments were performed with neuronavigation using the participant's own brain MRI. The Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI), MdDS Balance Rating Scale (MBRS), and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) were assessed weekly at four pretreatment and six posttreatment time points.

resultsTwenty participants chose either the occipital cortex (11) or cerebellar vermis (9) targets as most effective in reducing the oscillating vertigo; one chose lateral cerebellar hemisphere; five chose none. After 10 to 12 sessions of 1,200 pulses over the target of choice, 19 of 25 treatment completers noted ≥ 25% reduction, 12 of 25 ≥50% reduction, and 8 of 25 ≥75% reduction in oscillating vertigo intensity. A one-way repeated measures ANOVA of DHI, MBRS, and HADS scores before and after treatment showed significant reductions in DHI, MBRS, and the HADS Anxiety subscore immediately after treatment with most improvement lasting through posttreatment week 6. There were no significant Depression subscore changes. Participants who had chosen vermis stimulation had comparatively worse balance at baseline than those who had chosen occipital cortex stimulation.

conclusioncTBS over either the occipital cortex or cerebellar vermis is effective in reducing the oscillating vertigo of MdDS acutely and may confer long-term benefits. Sustained improvement requires more frequent treatments.

Indexed as

Transcranial Magnetic StimulationAdultAgedCerebellumFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedMotion PerceptionMotion SicknessOccipital LobeTreatment OutcomeVertigo

Identifiers

PMID31436631
PMCPMC6744334
OpenAlexW2969575649

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.