Trial reportAdvances in skin & wound care2019
Aurix Gel Is an Effective Intervention for Chronic Diabetic Foot Ulcers: A Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial.
Trial report in Advances in skin & wound care, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Efficacy and safety of platelet-rich plasma versus conventional care in diabetic foot ulcers: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Acta diabetologica · 2025Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Comparison of the efficacy and safety of different growth factors in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers: an updated network meta-analysis.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Pooled it
- Effect of platelet-rich plasma on healing of lower extremity diabetic skin ulcers: A meta-analysis.International wound journal · 2024Pooled it
- Clinical efficacy of blood derivatives on wound healing: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.International wound journal · 2024Pooled it
- A Net Meta-Analysis of the Effectiveness of Different Types of Dressings in the Treatment of Diabetic Foot.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2022Pooled it
- A Randomised Controlled Clinical Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of an Autologous Standardised Leukocyte-Poor Platelet Gel With Standard Care for the Treatment of Chronic Neuropathic Diabetic Foot Ulcers.International wound journal · 2025Trial
- Platelet-rich plasma in the management of diabetic foot ulcers (Review).Biomedical reports · 2026Review
- A Single-Institution Cohort Study of Autologous Platelet-Rich Plasma Gel for Hard-to-Heal Chronic Wounds: Potential Role in Microvascular Regeneration.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Platelet-Rich Plasma for Diabetic Foot Ulcers: A Cross-Sectional Appraisal of Overlapping Meta-Analyses.Diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy · 2026Article
- Efficacy of mesenchymal stem cells and platelet-rich plasma therapies on wound healing: A Systematic Review and meta-analysis.Regenerative therapy · 2025Review
- The Potential of Autologous Platelet-Rich Plasma Gel for Diabetic Foot Ulcer Care Among Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Therapeutics and clinical risk management · 2024Review
- Comparative efficacy of growth factor therapy in healing diabetes-related foot ulcers: A network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Diabetes/metabolism research and reviews · 2023Review
- Platelet-Rich Plasma in Chronic Wound Management: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Review
- Observation of the effect of one-to-one education on high-risk cases of diabetic foot.World journal of clinical cases · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAutologous platelet-rich plasma products can significantly vary with respect to platelet concentration, the presence of additional cellularity, and the use of additives. Therefore, the utility of each formulation for treating chronic wounds needs to be established.
objectiveTo establish the efficacy of up to 12 weeks of treatment with Aurix hematogel for healing diabetic foot ulcers against usual and customary care including any wound modality in 129 patients using a Medicare Coverage with Evidence Development paradigm.
methodsThis pragmatic randomized controlled trial was conducted in 28 real-world outpatient wound care sites using an inclusive design that included participants with various health risks, comorbidities (eg, peripheral arterial disease, smoking), and any wound severity (Wagner 1-4).
resultsKaplan-Meier analysis showed a significant (log-rank P = .0476) time-to-heal advantage, with 48.5% of wounds healing with Aurix hematogel compared with 30.2% with usual and customary care. A higher percentage of healing was observed for Aurix across all wound severities (Wagner grade 1-4). Subgroup analysis revealed a significant healing advantage for Aurix when treating wounds accompanied by peripheral arterial disease and a demonstrated advantage for smokers.
conclusionsThis first Coverage with Evidence Development study in wound care demonstrates the effectiveness of Aurix for treating diabetic foot ulcers in Medicare beneficiaries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.