Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31436582›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in rheumatology2019

Update on lupus epidemiology: advancing health disparities research through the study of minority populations.

Cristina Drenkard, S Sam Lim

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in rheumatology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Cristina DrenkardDivision of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, Emory School of Medicine.
S Sam LimDivision of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, Emory School of Medicine.

Funding

The Georgians Organized Against Lupus (GOAL) Cohort: Advancing Health DisparitiesU01DP005119 · DP · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI DRENKARD, CRISTINA MARTA, LIM, SUNG SAM · 2014 to 2018
$4.8M
The Georgians Organized Against Lupus (GOAL) Cohort: Addressing Health Disparities in Lupus through Social Determinants of HealthU01DP006488 · DP · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI DRENKARD, CRISTINA MARTA, LIM, SUNG SAM · 2019 to 2021
$2.6M
NCCDPHP CDC HHS U01 DP005119NCCDPHP CDC HHS U01 DP006488
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewThe current review focuses on recent population-based studies that have examined the burden of lupus, disease outcomes, and gaps in quality of care, with an emphasis in research addressing health disparities. RECENT

findingsThe Centers for Disease Control and Prevention National Lupus Registries underscored higher susceptibility of both systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and primary cutaneous lupus among people of color, compared with whites. Not only does SLE disproportionately strike people from racial and ethnic minorities, those individuals are also at increased risk of developing severe manifestations following SLE diagnosis. Mortality is higher and death occurs at a younger age among blacks, compared with whites. Furthermore, ongoing Centers for Disease Control and Prevention-supported population-based lupus cohorts, along with research by other groups, have provided new insight into the role of social determinants on outcomes and opportunities to improve care in diverse lupus populations. SUMMARY: While descriptive epidemiological efforts have been critical to providing more accurate estimates of the burden and mortality of lupus across diverse demographic groups, emerging research suggests a significant influence of psychosocial and healthcare system factors on disease outcomes. These current efforts represent important steps toward the development of clinical and public health interventions aimed at eliminating health disparities in lupus populations.

Indexed as

Healthcare DisparitiesMinority GroupsPublic HealthRegistriesGlobal HealthHumansIncidenceLupus Erythematosus, Systemic

Identifiers

PMID31436582
PMCPMC6791519

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.