Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31436446›Full record

Trial reportPsychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors2019

Testing the efficacy of motivational strategies, empathic reflections, and lifelike features in a computerized intervention for alcohol use: A factorial trial.

Emily R Grekin, Jessica R Beatty, Lucy McGoron, Kari C Kugler, Jennifer B McClure, Damaris E Pop, Steven J Ondersma

Abstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. A Causal Analysis of Young Adults' Binge Drinking Reduction and Cessation.European journal of investigation in health, psychology and education · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Emily R GrekinDepartment of Psychology, Wayne State University.ORCID 0000-0002-3426-2952
Jessica R BeattyMerrill Palmer Skillman Institute, Wayne State University.
Lucy McGoronMerrill Palmer Skillman Institute, Wayne State University.
Kari C KuglerDepartment of Biobehavioral Health, The Pennsylvania State University.
Jennifer B McClureKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute.
Damaris E PopDepartment of Psychology, Wayne State University.
Steven J OndersmaMerrill Palmer Skillman Institute, Wayne State University.

Funding

Pediatric Motivational mHealth Parent Training for Child Disruptive BehaviorsK01MH110600 · NIMH · WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY · PI MCGORON, KATHLEEN (LUCY) · 2017 to 2021
$554k
Optimizing e-interventions for Alcohol Use: Do Common Factors Apply?R21AA023660 · NIAAA · WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY · PI GREKIN, EMILY REBECCA · 2016 to 2017
$404k
NIAAA NIH HHS R21 AA023660NIMH NIH HHS K01 MH110600
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although computer delivered brief interventions (CDBIs) have been effective in reducing alcohol use, few studies have examined which components of CDBIs are most associated with drinking reductions. The current factorial trial deconstructed a brief alcohol intervention into component parts to identify main and interaction effects on drinking outcomes. Participants (N = 352) were randomly assigned to 1 of 16 possible combinations of four dichotomous (present vs. absent) CDBI components for which theoretical and empirical support was available: empathic reflections, motivational strategies, a spoken voice, and an animated narrator. We measured main and interaction effects of these components on the primary outcome of self-reported mean drinks per day at 1- and 3-month follow-up, as well as on secondary outcomes, including binge drinking, intentions to reduce drinking, and alcohol consequences. Participants reduced drinking across all alcohol use indices over the 3-month assessment period. These effects were stronger for participants who were exposed to motivational strategies, F = 7.7, p < .001. Empathic reflections, use of a spoken voice, and use of an animated narrator were not associated with reductions in alcohol use, either as main effects or in interaction with other factors. Results suggest that CDBIs using motivational strategies are effective in reducing alcohol use. However, empathic reflections and lifelike characteristics (e.g., narrator, voice) may operate differently in CDBIs than they do in person-delivered interventions. More research is needed to better understand how these (or other factors) may influence efficacy. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).

Indexed as

EmpathyFeedbackMotivationAdultAlcohol DrinkingAlcoholismCounselingFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleTherapy, Computer-AssistedYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID31436446
PMCPMC6742543

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.