ArticleJBRA assisted reproduction2019
The First Chinese Edited Babies: A Leap of Faith in Science.
Article in JBRA assisted reproduction, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- [Application of gene therapy in the treatment of hematological diseases: achievements, and economic and ethical aspects of the topic].Revista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social · 2024Pooled it
- Created, Not Engineered: Analyzing Human Gene Editing from a Catholic Anthropological and Moral Perspective.Journal of religion and health · 2026Article
- Molecular mastery: Harnessing DNA technology for disease prevention.Genes & diseases · 2026Review
- CRISPR Technology: Transforming the Future of Medicine and Diagnostics.Biochemistry · 2025Review
- Transgression of planetary boundaries and the effects on child health through an infectious diseases lens.Current opinion in pediatrics · 2025Review
- Harnessing bacterial immunity: CRISPR-Cas system as a versatile tool in combating pathogens and revolutionizing medicine.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025Review
- The future of embryo engineering and fertility research in interdisciplinary collaboration.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025Review
- Article
- Beyond the traditional distinctions of genome editing: evaluating a vulnerability framework.Frontiers in genome editing · 2024Article
- Demystification and feasibility of CRISPR technology and gene editing in African laboratories.Biology open · 2023Article
- CRISPR Technology: A Jewish Legal Perspective.Rambam Maimonides medical journal · 2022Article
- Governing biotechnology to provide safety and security and address ethical, legal, and social implications.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Article
- Article
- The Promise of Emergent Nanobiotechnologies for In Vivo Applications and Implications for Safety and Security.Health securityArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.