Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31436165›Full record

Trial reportJMIR mHealth and uHealth2019

The Elusive Path Toward Measuring Health Outcomes: Lessons Learned From a Pseudo-Randomized Controlled Trial of a Large-Scale Mobile Health Initiative.

Patricia Mechael, Nadi Nina Kaonga, Subhashini Chandrasekharan, Muthu Perumal Prakash, Joanne Peter, Aakash Ganju, Nirmala Murthy

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Patricia Mechael *HealthEnabled, Washington, DC, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-1034-0549
Nadi Nina Kaonga *All of Us Research Program, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-6900-9893
Subhashini Chandrasekharan *All of Us Research Program, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-9894-3263
Muthu Perumal PrakashFoundation for Research in Health Systems, Chennai, India.ORCID 0000-0002-0672-1103
Joanne PeterJohnson & Johnson, Cape Town, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0001-7795-4150
Aakash Ganju *Saati Health, Mumbai, India.ORCID 0000-0001-9547-4046
Nirmala Murthy *Foundation for Research in Health Systems, Bengaluru, India.ORCID 0000-0002-5143-2503

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mobile health (mHealth) offers new opportunities to improve access to health services and health information. It also presents new challenges in evaluating its impact, particularly in linking the use of a technology intervention that aims to improve health behaviors with the health outcomes that are impacted by changed behaviors. The availability of data from a multitude of sources (paper-based and electronic) provides the conditions to facilitate making stronger connections between self-reported data and clinical outcomes. This commentary shares lessons and important considerations based on the experience of applying new research frameworks and incorporating maternal and child health records data into a pseudo-randomized controlled trial to evaluate the impact of mMitra, a stage-based voice messaging program to improve maternal, newborn, and child health outcomes in urban slums in India.

Indexed as

AdultFemaleHealth PromotionHumansIndiaMothersOutcome Assessment, Health CarePregnancyPregnant PeopleProgram DevelopmentTelemedicineText MessagingWeights and Measureschild healthIndiamaternal healthmHealthresearch

Identifiers

PMID31436165
PMCPMC6724498

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.