Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31436151›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene2019

Making Pastoralists Count: Geospatial Methods for the Health Surveillance of Nomadic Populations.

Hannah Wild, Luke Glowacki, Stace Maples, Iván Mejía-Guevara, Amy Krystosik, Matthew H Bonds, Abiy Hiruy, A Desiree LaBeaud, Michele Barry

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Hannah WildStanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
Luke GlowackiDepartment of Anthropology, Pennsylvania State University.
Stace MaplesStanford Geospatial Center, Stanford University, Stanford, California.
Iván Mejía-GuevaraStanford Center for Population Health Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
Amy KrystosikDivision of Infectious Disease, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
Matthew H BondsDepartment of Global Health and Social Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Abiy HiruyPathfinder International, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
A Desiree LaBeaudDivision of Infectious Disease, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
Michele BarryThe Center for Innovation in Global Health, Stanford University, Stanford, California.

Funding

Stanford Medicine Center for Longevity and Healthy Aging Research Education CoreP30AG059307 · NIA · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI ZOU, JAMES · 2018 to 2025
$4.9M
NIA NIH HHS P30 AG059307
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nomadic pastoralists are among the world's hardest-to-reach and least served populations. Pastoralist communities are difficult to capture in household surveys because of factors including their high degree of mobility over remote terrain, fluid domestic arrangements, and cultural barriers. Most surveys use census-based sampling frames which do not accurately capture the demographic and health parameters of nomadic populations. As a result, pastoralists are "invisible" in population data such as the Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS). By combining remote sensing and geospatial analysis, we developed a sampling strategy designed to capture the current distribution of nomadic populations. We then implemented this sampling frame to survey a population of mobile pastoralists in southwest Ethiopia, focusing on maternal and child health (MCH) indicators. Using standardized instruments from DHS questionnaires, we draw comparisons with regional and national data finding disparities with DHS data in core MCH indicators, including vaccination coverage, skilled birth attendance, and nutritional status. Our field validation demonstrates that this method is a logistically feasible alternative to conventional sampling frames and may be used at the population level. Geospatial sampling methods provide cost-affordable and logistically feasible strategies for sampling mobile populations, a crucial first step toward reaching these groups with health services.

Indexed as

Maternal-Child Health ServicesSpatial AnalysisAdolescentAdultChildChild, PreschoolEthiopiaFemaleGeographic Information SystemsHealth SurveysHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMaleMiddle AgedRemote Sensing Technology

Identifiers

PMID31436151
PMCPMC6726942

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.