ArticleBrain pathology (Zurich, Switzerland)2020
Clinical relevance of molecular subgrouping of gliomatosis cerebri per 2016 WHO classification: a clinicopathological study of 89 cases.
Article in Brain pathology (Zurich, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Revisiting gliomatosis cerebri in adult-type diffuse gliomas: a comprehensive imaging, genomic and clinical analysis.Acta neuropathologica communications · 2024Article
- Clinical and imaging characteristics of supratentorial glioma with IDH2 mutation.Neuroradiology · 2024Article
- An enduring debate on gliomatosis cerebri.Brain tumor pathology · 2023Review
- Article
- A Risk Model Developed Based on Homologous Recombination Deficiency Predicts Overall Survival in Patients With Lower Grade Glioma.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Article
- Genome-wide methylomic analyses identify prognostic epigenetic signature in lower grade glioma.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2022Article
- Negative Prognostic Implication ofIndian journal of surgical oncology · 2021Article
- Diffuse astrocytic glioma, IDH-Wildtype, with molecular features of glioblastoma, WHO grade IV: A single-institution case series and review.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2021Review
- Gliomatosis cerebri (GC) or GC-like? A picture to be reconsidered in neuro-oncology based on large retrospective analysis of GC series.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2020Article
- Article
- Gliomatosis cerebri (GC) growth pattern: A single-center analysis of clinical, histological, and molecular characteristics of GC and non-GC glioblastoma.Neuro-oncology advancesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The extremely invasive phenotypes and genotypes related to progression of gliomatosis cerebri (GC) remain unclear although GC has been removed as an independent entity from the 2016 WHO classification. Hence, categorization of GC under the current WHO molecular classification is essential, and the molecular subgroups that might contribute to GC progression should be compared with the histopathological differences between initial and new lesions identified during follow-up. Analyses of IDH1/2 and TERTp mutations and 1p/19q co-deletion, and immunohistochemistry of IDH1-R132H, ATRX, p53 and galectin-3 were performed. Anaplastic astrocytoma, IDH-wildtype (AA-IDHwt) was the common molecular subgroup (52.8%), followed by diffuse astrocytoma, IDH-wildtype (DA-IDHwt) and AA, IDH-mutant (AA-IDHmt) (each 16.9%), DA-IDHmt (7.9%), glioblastoma (GBM)-IDHwt (3.3%) and GBM-IDHmt (2.2%). Approximately 92% of the AA-IDHwt lesions progressed to histologically confirmed GBM in the newly enhanced lesions harboring the TERTp mutation and expressing galectin-3. Similar to primary GBMs, GC-related GBMs that progressed from the IDHwt subgroups showed microvascular proliferation, palisading necrosis or thrombotic occlusion, implying that a subset of IDHwt subgroups may evolve to overt GBM. Molecular subgrouping did not provide the perfect prediction for the survival of GC patients. The AA-IDHwt group showed worse overall and progression-free survival (PFS) than the AA-IDHmt group. Biopsy plus radiotherapy, chemotherapy and temozolomide treatment for DA-IDHwt, and resection plus radiotherapy and temozolomide treatment for AA-IDHwt prolonged PFS. In conclusions, majority of GC was of the AA-IDHwt subgroup, which progressed to GBM. Molecular subgroups may assist in the selection of treatment modalities, because "GC pattern" still remains as a special growth of gliomas in WHO 2016 classification without established treatment guideline.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.