Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31435963›Full record

ArticleBrain pathology (Zurich, Switzerland)2020

Clinical relevance of molecular subgrouping of gliomatosis cerebri per 2016 WHO classification: a clinicopathological study of 89 cases.

Mi Jung Kwon, So Young Kang, Haeyon Cho, Jung Il Lee, Sung Tae Kim, Yeon-Lim Suh

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain pathology (Zurich, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. An enduring debate on gliomatosis cerebri.Brain tumor pathology · 2023
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Negative Prognostic Implication ofIndian journal of surgical oncology · 2021
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Gliomatosis cerebri (GC) or GC-like? A picture to be reconsidered in neuro-oncology based on large retrospective analysis of GC series.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mi Jung KwonDepartment of Pathology, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, Anyang, South Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-2441-0448
So Young KangDepartment of Pathology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Haeyon ChoDepartment of Pathology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Jung Il LeeDepartment of Neurosurgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Sung Tae KimDepartment of Radiology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Yeon-Lim SuhDepartment of Pathology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-5809-2401
Samsung Medical Center · KRHallym University Sacred Heart Hospital · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The extremely invasive phenotypes and genotypes related to progression of gliomatosis cerebri (GC) remain unclear although GC has been removed as an independent entity from the 2016 WHO classification. Hence, categorization of GC under the current WHO molecular classification is essential, and the molecular subgroups that might contribute to GC progression should be compared with the histopathological differences between initial and new lesions identified during follow-up. Analyses of IDH1/2 and TERTp mutations and 1p/19q co-deletion, and immunohistochemistry of IDH1-R132H, ATRX, p53 and galectin-3 were performed. Anaplastic astrocytoma, IDH-wildtype (AA-IDHwt) was the common molecular subgroup (52.8%), followed by diffuse astrocytoma, IDH-wildtype (DA-IDHwt) and AA, IDH-mutant (AA-IDHmt) (each 16.9%), DA-IDHmt (7.9%), glioblastoma (GBM)-IDHwt (3.3%) and GBM-IDHmt (2.2%). Approximately 92% of the AA-IDHwt lesions progressed to histologically confirmed GBM in the newly enhanced lesions harboring the TERTp mutation and expressing galectin-3. Similar to primary GBMs, GC-related GBMs that progressed from the IDHwt subgroups showed microvascular proliferation, palisading necrosis or thrombotic occlusion, implying that a subset of IDHwt subgroups may evolve to overt GBM. Molecular subgrouping did not provide the perfect prediction for the survival of GC patients. The AA-IDHwt group showed worse overall and progression-free survival (PFS) than the AA-IDHmt group. Biopsy plus radiotherapy, chemotherapy and temozolomide treatment for DA-IDHwt, and resection plus radiotherapy and temozolomide treatment for AA-IDHwt prolonged PFS. In conclusions, majority of GC was of the AA-IDHwt subgroup, which progressed to GBM. Molecular subgroups may assist in the selection of treatment modalities, because "GC pattern" still remains as a special growth of gliomas in WHO 2016 classification without established treatment guideline.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBrain NeoplasmsChildFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasms, NeuroepithelialPrognosisProgression-Free SurvivalRetrospective StudiesYoung Adultdisease progressiongliomatosis cerebrihistologyIDH wildtype glioblastomaWorld Health Organization 2016 classification

Identifiers

PMID31435963
PMCPMC8018049
OpenAlexW2969619333

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.