ArticleClinical pharmacokinetics2020
Development and Validation of a Population-Pharmacokinetic Model for Rurioctacog Alfa Pegol (Adynovate
Article in Clinical pharmacokinetics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Direct comparison of two extended half-life PEGylated recombinant FVIII products: a randomized, crossover pharmacokinetic study in patients with severe hemophilia A.Annals of hematology · 2020Trial
- A revised classification of FVIII concentrates: rationale and novel metrics.Blood advances · 2026Article
- Article
- On inductive biases for the robust and interpretable prediction of drug concentrations using deep compartment models.Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics · 2024Article
- Kinetic Modeling for BT200 to Predict the Level of Plasma-Derived Coagulation Factor VIII in Humans.The AAPS journal · 2024Article
- Predictive performance of pharmacokinetic-guided prophylactic dosing of factor concentrates in hemophilia A and B.Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2024Article
- A French Real-World Evidence Study Evaluating the Efficacy, Safety, and Pharmacokinetic Parameters of rVIII-SingleChain in Patients with Hemophilia A Receiving Prophylaxis.Thrombosis and haemostasis · 2023Article
- Design of a Prospective Study on Pharmacokinetic-Guided Dosing of Prophylactic Factor Replacement in Hemophilia A and B (OPTI-CLOT TARGET Study).TH open : companion journal to thrombosis and haemostasis · 2022Article
- Population pharmacokinetic modeling of factor concentrates in hemophilia: an overview and evaluation of best practice.Blood advances · 2021Review
- Terminal half-life of FVIII and FIX according to age, blood group and concentrate type: Data from the WAPPS database.Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis : JTH · 2021Article
- Protein nanoparticles in drug delivery: animal protein, plant proteins and protein cages, albumin nanoparticles.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2021Review
- Population Pharmacokinetics of Clotting Factor Concentrates and Desmopressin in Hemophilia.Clinical pharmacokinetics · 2021Review
- Therapeutic Nanoparticles and Their Targeted Delivery Applications.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectiveRurioctacog alfa pegol (Adynovate) is a modified recombinant factor VIII concentrate used for treating hemophilia A. Aiming to improve treatment tailoring on the Web-Accessible Population Pharmacokinetic Service-Hemophilia (WAPPS-Hemo) platform for patients of all ages treated with Adynovate, we have developed and evaluated a population pharmacokinetic (PopPK) model. On the platform, PopPK models are used as priors for Bayesian forecasting that derive individual PK of hemophilia patients and are subsequently used for personalized dose regimen design.
methodsFactor activity measurements and demographic covariate data from patients infused with Adynovate were extracted from the WAPPS-Hemo database. Evaluations testing the appropriateness of Bayesian forecasting included 10-fold cross validation, a limited sampling analysis (LSA), and an external evaluation using additional independent data extracted from the WAPPS-Hemo database at a later date.
resultsThe model was constructed using 650 plasma factor activity observations (555 one stage assay and 95 chromogenic assay - 4.6% below limit of quantification) measured in 154 patients from 36 hemophilia centres. A two-compartment model including between subject variability on clearance and central volume was selected as the base model. Covariates were fat free mass on clearance and central volume, age on clearance and assay type on activity. The final model was well-suited to predict PK parameters of new individuals (n = 26) from sparse observations.
conclusionsThe development of a PopPK model for Adynovate using real-world data increases the covariate space (e.g. age) beyond what is possible from clinical trial data. This model is available on the WAPPS-Hemo platform for tailoring treatment in hemophilia A patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31435896What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.