Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31435894›Full record

ArticleJournal of computer-aided molecular design2019

Evaluation of different virtual screening strategies on the basis of compound sets with characteristic core distributions and dissimilarity relationships.

Tomoyuki Miyao, Swarit Jasial, Jürgen Bajorath, Kimito Funatsu

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of computer-aided molecular design, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Tomoyuki MiyaoData Science Center and Graduate School of Science and Technology, Nara Institute of Science and Technology, 8916-5, Takayama-cho, Ikoma, Nara, 630-0192, Japan. miyao@dsc.naist.jp.ORCID 0000-0002-8769-2702
Swarit JasialDepartment of Life Science Informatics, B-IT, LIMES Program Unit Chemical Biology and Medicinal Chemistry, Endenicher Allee 19c, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität, 53115, Bonn, Germany.
Jürgen BajorathDepartment of Life Science Informatics, B-IT, LIMES Program Unit Chemical Biology and Medicinal Chemistry, Endenicher Allee 19c, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität, 53115, Bonn, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0557-5714
Kimito FunatsuData Science Center and Graduate School of Science and Technology, Nara Institute of Science and Technology, 8916-5, Takayama-cho, Ikoma, Nara, 630-0192, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-9368-0302

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this work, computational compound screening strategies on the basis of two- and three-dimensional (2D and 3D) molecular representations were investigated including similarity searching and support vector machine (SVM) ranking. Calculations based on topological fingerprints and molecular shape queries and features were compared. A unique aspect of the analysis setting apart from previous comparisons of 2D and 3D virtual screening approaches has been the design of compound reference, training, and test data sets with controlled incremental increases in intra-set structural diversity and different categories of structural relationships between reference/training and test sets. The use of these data sets made it possible to assess the relative performance of 2D and 3D screening strategies under increasingly challenging conditions ultimately leading to the use of training and test sets with essentially unrelated structures. The results showed that 3D similarity searching had little advantage over 2D searching in identifying active compounds with remote structural relationships. However, 3D SVM models trained on the basis of shape features were superior to other approaches (including 2D SVM) when the detection of structure-activity relationships became increasingly challenging. Such 3D SVM methods has thus far only been little investigated in virtual screening, proving a wealth of opportunities for further analyses.

Indexed as

Structure-Activity RelationshipSupport Vector MachineUser-Computer InterfaceComputational ChemistryMachine LearningMolecular ConformationProtein Binding2D vs. 3D methodsBioactive compoundsChemoinformaticsCompound diversity distributionsData set designMachine learningSimilarity searchingVirtual screening

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.