ArticleDemography2019
Choice Set Formation in Residential Mobility and Its Implications for Segregation Dynamics.
Article in Demography, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- The role of professional networks and institutional prestige in shaping the first career moves of scholars.PNAS nexus · 2026Article
- Ingroup preferences, segregation, and intergroup contact in neighborhoods and civic organizations.PNAS nexus · 2025Article
- Understanding the "package deal": disentangling parents' intertwined preferences for schools and neighborhoods.Social forces; a scientific medium of social study and interpretation · 2025Article
- Maximizing Utility or Avoiding Losses? Uncovering Decision Rule-Heterogeneity in Sociological Research with an Application to Neighbourhood Choice.Sociological methods & research · 2025Article
- Predicting Covid-19 infection and death rates among E.U. minority populations in the absence of racially disaggregated data through the use of US data comparisons.European journal of public health · 2024Article
- Segmented information, segregated outcomes: Housing affordability and neighborhood representation on a voucher-focused online housing platform and three mainstream alternatives.Housing policy debate · 2023Article
- Residential mobility, neighborhood cohesion, and depressive symptoms among urban-dwelling African American adolescents.Journal of community psychology · 2022Article
- Life Course Events and Migration in the Transition to Adulthood.Social forces; a scientific medium of social study and interpretation · 2021Article
- Skill-Based Contextual Sorting: How Parental Cognition and Residential Mobility Produce Unequal Environments for Children.Demography · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We develop and estimate a statistical model of neighborhood choice that draws on insights from cognitive science and decision theory as well as qualitative studies of housing search. The model allows for a sequential decision process and the possibility that people consider a small and selective subset of all potential destinations. When combined with data from the Los Angeles Family and Neighborhood Survey, our model reveals that affordability constraints and households' tendency toward short-distance moves lead blacks and Hispanics to have racially stratified choice sets in which their own group is disproportionately represented. We use an agent-based model to assess how racially stratified choice sets contribute to segregation outcomes. Our results show that cognitive decision strategies can amplify patterns of segregation and inequality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.