ArticleBrain structure & function2019
Improving sensitivity, specificity, and reproducibility of individual brainstem activation.
Article in Brain structure & function, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- When attention falters: Brain, breathing, and behavioral signals of lapses in interoceptive attention.Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience · 2026Article
- When attention falters: brain, breathing, and behavioral signals of lapses in interoceptive attention.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Evaluating the quality of brainstem ROI registration using structural and diffusion MRI.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Article
- A sensation driven functional MRI study on brain activation during bladder filling in healthy participants.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Subcortical nuclei of the human ascending arousal system encode anticipated reward but do not predict subsequent memory.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2025Article
- Dynamic functional connectivity signatures of focused attention on the breath in adolescents.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2025Article
- Distinguishing the activity of adjacent somatosensory nuclei within the brainstem using 3T fMRI.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025Article
- Simultaneous cortical, subcortical, and brainstem mapping of sensory activation.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2024Article
- Simultaneous cortical, subcortical, and brainstem mapping of sensory activation.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Pupil size reflects activation of subcortical ascending arousal system nuclei during rest.eLife · 2023Article
- Unsupervised physiological noise correction of functional magnetic resonance imaging data using phase and magnitude information (PREPAIR).Human brain mapping · 2023Article
- fMRI studies evaluating central respiratory control in humans.Frontiers in neural circuits · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Functional imaging of the brainstem may open new avenues for clinical diagnostics. However, for reliable assessments of brainstem activation, further efforts improving signal quality are needed. Six healthy subjects performed four repeated functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) sessions on different days with jaw clenching as a motor task to elicit activation in the trigeminal motor nucleus. Functional images were acquired with a 7 T MR scanner using an optimized multiband EPI sequence. Activation measures in the trigeminal nucleus and a control region were assessed using different physiological noise correction methods (aCompCor and RETROICOR-based approaches with variable numbers of regressors) combined with cerebrospinal fluid or brainstem masking. Receiver-operating characteristic analyses accounting for sensitivity and specificity, activation overlap analyses to estimate the reproducibility between sessions, and intraclass correlation analyses (ICC) for testing reliability between subjects and sessions were used to systematically compare the physiological noise correction approaches. Masking the brainstem led to increased activation in the target ROI and resulted in higher values for the area under the curve (AUC) as a combined measure for sensitivity and specificity. With the highest values for AUC, activation overlap, and ICC, the most favorable physiological noise correction method was to control for the cerebrospinal fluid time series (aCompCor with one regressor). Brainstem motor nuclei activation can be reliably identified using high-field fMRI with optimized acquisition and processing strategies-even on single-subject level. Applying specific physiological noise correction methods improves reproducibility and reliability of brainstem activation encouraging future clinical applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.