Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31435726›Full record

ReviewPediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany)2020

Caregiver burden in pediatric dialysis.

Aaron Wightman

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. When external factors limit care options for complex fetal and neonatal diagnoses.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2025
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Bilateral renal agenesis: fetal intervention and outcomes.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Beyond Autonomy: Ethics of Decision Making About Treatments for Kidney Failure at the Extremes of Age.American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Aaron WightmanDivisions of Nephrology, Bioethics and Palliative Care, Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA. aaron.wightman@seattlechildrens.org.ORCID 0000-0003-0167-0420

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In spite of improvements in expected survival, neurodevelopmental outcome, and quality of life, decision-making in neonatal dialysis remains controversial in high-resource countries. In part, this may be based upon the significant burdens experienced by the child, and also those experienced by the parents as caregivers. Emerging research offers a clearer description of the burdens experienced by dialysis caregivers worldwide. Caregiver burden represents an important area for nephrologists to advocate for patients and their families; however, nephrologists must also recognize the realities caregivers currently experience. Incorporation of caregiver burden into medical decision-making for children with end-stage kidney disease is necessary, but raises several ethical concerns.

Indexed as

Quality of LifeAdolescentCaregiver BurdenChildChild, PreschoolDecision MakingFamilyHumansInfantInfant, NewbornRenal DialysisRenal Insufficiency, ChronicCaregiver burdenDecision-makingDialysisEthics

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.