ArticlePediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany)2019
Long-term outcome of Japanese children with complicated minimal change nephrotic syndrome treated with mycophenolate mofetil after cyclosporine.
Article in Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Optimal selection and timing of steroid-sparing therapy in childhood nephrotic syndrome: what determines long-term outcomes of adult survivors?Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2026Article
- Shear wave elastography for assessing kidneys in pediatric patients with primary nephrotic syndrome.Insights into imaging · 2025Article
- Adult survivors of childhood-onset steroid-dependent and steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome treated with cyclosporine: a long-term single-center experience.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2024Article
- Article
- CD80 Insights as Therapeutic Target in the Current and Future Treatment Options of Frequent-Relapse Minimal Change Disease.BioMed research international · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAlthough recent studies have shown that more than half of children with steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome (SDNS) may continue to have active disease beyond childhood, the long-term outcome in this cohort treated with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) after cyclosporine remains unknown, particularly in adulthood.
methodsWe conducted a retrospective study of 44 adult patients (median age, 22.3 years) who received MMF for complicated SDNS (median age at MMF initiation, 13.3 years) at a single center. Complicated SDNS was defined as the case continuing to relapse after cyclosporine (CsA) treatment. When patients experienced relapses despite MMF initiation, they additionally received a rituximab infusion. The primary endpoint was the probability of achieving treatment-free remission for > 2 years.
resultsPrior to MMF initiation, all patients received CsA for a median of 46 months and 19 received the 12-week cyclophosphamide. After switching from CsA to MMF, only four patients did not relapse during a median follow-up period of 9.6 years. At the last visit, only 15 of the 44 patients achieved treatment-free sustained remission. Multivariate analysis revealed that young age (< 6 years) at onset of nephrotic syndrome (odds ratio, 11.3) and the experience of steroid dependency during initial CsA treatment (odds ratio, 29.8) were the independent risk factors of active disease into adulthood after MMF initiation.
conclusionsAlthough none developed renal insufficiency and severe adverse effects of therapy, the introduction of MMF after CsA treatment may not be necessarily associated with improved long-term outcome of children with complicated SDNS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.