Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31435599›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of reproductive biomedicine2019

The comparison of depression and anxiety between fertile and infertile couples: A meta-analysis study.

Hossein Fallahzadeh, Hasan Zareei Mahmood Abadi, Mahdieh Momayyezi, Hakimeh Malaki Moghadam, Naeimeh Keyghobadi

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of reproductive biomedicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07154888 (Fast Track to Fertility), which is not on this map. Cited by 27 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07154888 naactive not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Fast Track to Fertility: Randomized Controlled Quality Improvement Initiative of an Algorithmic Text Messaging Communication and Patient Education Platform Designed to Improve the Efficiency the Fertility Workup

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of PennsylvaniaRan2025 to 2027Enrolled160ConditionsInfertilityArmsFast Track to Fertility Algorithmic Text Messaging Platform
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Timed intercourse for couples trying to conceive.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023
    Pooled it
  3. Psychological aspects of infertility. A systematic review.The Journal of international medical research · 2020
    Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Impact of Stress and Financials on Romanian Infertile Women Accessing Assisted Reproductive Treatment.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hossein FallahzadehResearch Center of Prevention and Epidemiology of Non-Communicable Disease, School of Public health, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran.
Hasan Zareei Mahmood AbadiDepartment of Psychology, Faculty of Humanities, Yazd University, Yazd, Iran.
Mahdieh MomayyeziResearch Center of Prevention and Epidemiology of Non-Communicable Disease, School of Public health, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran.
Hakimeh Malaki MoghadamDepartment of Statistics and Epidemiology, School of Public health, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran.
Naeimeh KeyghobadiDepartment of Statistics and Epidemiology, School of Public health, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran.
Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences and Health Services · IRYazd University · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDepression and anxiety are the most common reaction in infertile couples. Several studies have been conducted to examine the psychiatric disorders among infertile and fertile couples.

objectiveThis meta-analysis was conducted to compare the depression and anxiety in fertile and infertile couples in various studies. MATERIALS AND

methodsThe authors searched articles published in multiple databases including World Health Organization, PubMed, Cochrane Library, Scopus, Science Direct, Medline EMBASE and Persian databases including Scientific Information Database (SID) and IranMedx between 2005 and 2017. The main keywords used for searching the databases were: depression, anxiety, infertility, and fertility. Statistical analyses were performed using Comprehensive Meta-Analysis/2.0 software.

resultsThe authors found 42 related articles after searching the databases. 11 articles entered the meta-analysis after considering the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Finally, eight articles were chosen for the comparison of depression and anxiety, two published articles for the comparison of depression, and one published article to compare anxiety in fertile and infertile couples. The results of the heterogeneity test showed a significant heterogeneity among all articles that were analyzed in this meta-analysis in the field of depression and anxiety. The results showed that depression (p = 0.0001; Hedges'g = 1.21; 95% CI 0.63-1.78) and anxiety (p = 0.00001; Hedges'g = 0.63; 95% CI 0.54-0.73) were higher in infertile couples than fertile couples and that the possibility of a publication bias does not exist in this study.

conclusionThe analysis of articles used in this meta-analysis showed that depression and anxiety scores in infertile couples were higher than fertile couples.

Indexed as

AnxietyDepressionInfertilityMeta-analysis.

Identifiers

PMID31435599
PMCPMC6661138
OpenAlexW2947636163

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.