ArticleJournal of Taibah University Medical Sciences2018
Evaluation of inhaler technique among patients with asthma and COPD in Yemen.
Article in Journal of Taibah University Medical Sciences, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 315 citations in OpenAlex.
- Flowrate Sensing and Measurement in Portable Smart Inhalers.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Misuse of Respiratory Inhalers Among Hospitalized Patients in a Tertiary Health Care Hospital in Kabul.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2023Article
- Characteristics of Inhaler Technique in COPD Patients in a Specialized Center in Armenia, Colombia: A Cross-Sectional Study.Patient preference and adherence · 2023Article
- Optimizing inhalation therapy in the aspect of peak inhalation flow rate in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or asthma.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThis study aimed to evaluate metered-dose inhaler (MDI) technique among Yemeni patients with asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and to investigate factors that affect correct use of MDIs.
methodsA cross-sectional study was conducted in five pharmacies in the Yemeni capital city of Sana'a to evaluate MDI technique among adult patients with asthma and COPD and to investigate factors that influence proper application of MDI techniques.
resultsOf 49 patients, 47 (95.9%) were males and two (4.1%) were females. The mean age of the patients was 52.90 ± 6 years (range: 43-64 years). This study showed that only nine patients (18.4%) demonstrated good knowledge of MDI techniques; two patients (4.1%) demonstrated moderate knowledge; the majority of patients (77.6%) showed poor knowledge regarding correct MDI technique. Previous training regarding MDI technique was the only factor that affected appropriate use of MDIs.
conclusionThe majority of patients in this study could not use their MDI appropriately. Thus, patients should be educated regarding correct MDI technique upon dispensing of inhaler medications. Training and educational intervention programs may contribute to improved MDI technique among patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.