ArticleJournal of Taibah University Medical Sciences2018
Hepatoprotective and antioxidant activities of
Article in Journal of Taibah University Medical Sciences, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.
- New Insights into Chemical Profiles and Health-Promoting Effects of Edible MushroomJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Article
- Protective Effects ofMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- HPLC-DAD analysis and antimicrobial activities of3 Biotech · 2022Article
- Antidiabetic and Antihyperlipidemic Effects of Methanolic Extract of Leaves ofFrontiers in physiology · 2022Article
- Exploring the Chemical Profiles and Biological Values of TwoAntioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- The potential effect of phytochemicals and herbal plant remedies for treating drug-induced hepatotoxicity: a review.Molecular biology reports · 2021Review
- The Protective Effects ofFrontiers in pharmacology · 2021Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objective
methodsForty-two rats were distributed into seven groups. Groups A and B received water; groups C and D received 500 and 1000 mg/kg SML extract, respectively; groups E and F received 500 and 1000 mg/kg SMS extract, respectively; and group G received 100 mg/kg silymarin. Water, the two extracts, and silymarin were administered daily by oral gavage for 7 days. Hepatotoxicity was induced in groups B to G by the administration of CCl
resultsAdministration of CCl
conclusionThis study provides preliminary evidence supporting the potential therapeutic benefit of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.