ArticleJournal of Taibah University Medical Sciences2017
Performance of the BD ProbeTec ET direct detection assay for the analysis of
Article in Journal of Taibah University Medical Sciences, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesEarly detection of Mycobacterial tuberculosis infection (MTB) is pivotal for the treatment of tuberculosis (TB).
backgroundThis study was performed to evaluate the performance of BD ProbeTec ET direct detection assay (DTB) against the gold standard culture technique for confirmation of MTB infection.
methodsA total of 266 consecutive and non-duplicate clinical specimens for detection of MTB were included in this study. There were 118 respiratory and 148 non-respiratory samples. All samples were tested by microscopy for acid-fast bacillus (AFB), MTB culture and biochemical identification with simultaneous testing by DTB.
resultsA total of 88 samples (33%) were culture-positive for MTB including 39/118 respiratory, 29/99 fluid and 20/49 tissue samples. DTB sensitivity for respiratory samples was 97% and specificity was 96% with a positive predictive value (PPV) of 93% and negative predictive value (NPV) of 99%. Sensitivity of DTB in fluid samples was 80%, specificity 88%, PPV 69% and NPV 93% whereas sensitivity of DTB for tissue samples was 25%, specificity 90%, PPV 63% and NPV 63%. Of the 50 (56.8%) smear-positive samples, DTB sensitivity was 100% for respiratory, 85% for fluid and 100% for tissue samples.
conclusionDTB performed within acceptable limits for the rapid detection of MTB in respiratory samples compared to fluid and tissue specimens.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.