ArticleJournal of Taibah University Medical Sciences2017
Distress and psychopathology among Sudanese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and its relation to glycaemic control.
Article in Journal of Taibah University Medical Sciences, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prevalence and associated factors of diabetes-related distress among type 2 diabetic patients in Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC public health · 2025Pooled it
- Article
- Diabetes distress in Barbadian adults with type 2 diabetes.AIMS public health · 2022Article
- Prevalence of depression and associated factors among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in eastern Sudan.BMC psychiatry · 2021Article
- Psychological Predictors of Adherence to Self-Care Behaviour amongst Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) Visiting Public Hospital, North India.Indian journal of endocrinology and metabolismArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThe link between diabetes control and depression is contradictory and inconsistent. Emotional distress is a single and continuous characteristic that has two primary components: content and severity. This finding could provide a link between major depression, diabetes distress, and depression symptoms. In the present study, we aimed to investigate the relationship between depression and diabetes distress and glycaemic control.
methodsThis cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted at a diabetes centre in Omdurman, Sudan, from June to August 2016. Eighty-nine patients with type 2 diabetes and 29 control subjects for psychopathology were interviewed using an English version of the structured 12-item diabetes distress general health questionnaire. Glycaemic control was assessed by measuring glycated haemoglobin in a blood sample drawn from each participant.
resultsEighty-nine diabetic patients and 29 age- and sex-matched controls compose the study cohort. As many as 87.6% of diabetic patients scored >3 for diabetes distress, and psychopathology was reported in 78.8% of diabetic patients vs. 21.2% in control subjects. Emotional burden was most correlated among the components of diabetes distress followed by the physician-related domain. HbA1c level was related to the emotional burden and regimen-related domains of diabetes distress (P-value <0.05). No relationship was evident among other distress domains, psychopathology, or the duration of diabetes.
conclusionDiabetes distress and depression are prevalent among Sudanese diabetic patients. Glycated haemoglobin level was related to the emotional burden of diabetes distress and the regimen-related domain but not to depression or diabetes duration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.