ArticleJournal of Taibah University Medical Sciences2017
Reflections by potential health care providers on a research methodology course taught under a primary health care centre: An experience of inter-professional education.
Article in Journal of Taibah University Medical Sciences, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesPublic health research demands a collaborative approach in working with communities to combat expected challenges in the field. Therefore, to improve primary care services, a training programme on research methodology, focusing on the principles of inter-professional education (IPE), was introduced at Karachi Medical and Dental College. The objectives of this study were to assess the level of learning by participants in the domain of communication and to explore participants' opinions and evaluations of the training programme.
methodsA total of 96 participants, including faculty members, medical students, social works students and health technicians in the research methodology course, were selected during March to September 2010. The study employed mixed method research in which communication competencies and participants' perceptions, as captured by course evaluations, were analysed, and findings were triangulated.
resultsThe results showed that 87% of faculty enjoyed contributing to 'inter-professional relationships' and that 'teamwork' skills in community-focused areas improved among 90% of students. As many as 78% of students and 70% of faculty members identified 'active listening' and 'communicating information to families', respectively, as being learned to a lesser extent. These findings were defended by their deliberations on course evaluation.
conclusionLearning through inter-professional relationships was found to be most effective among faculty, whereas learning through teamwork was found to be most effective among students. Moreover, it was found that information was better communicated to families by students than by faculty staff.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.