Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31435186›Full record

ArticleZooKeys2019

An annotated checklist of freshwater Copepoda (Crustacea, Hexanauplia) from continental Ecuador and the Galapagos Archipelago.

Paulo Henrique Costa Corgosinho, Maria Hołyńska, Federico Marrone, Luís José de Oliveira Geraldes-Primeiro, Edinaldo Nelson Dos Santos-Silva, Gilmar Perbiche-Neves, Carlos López

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ZooKeys, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. PeerJ · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Paulo Henrique Costa CorgosinhoDep. Biologia Geral. Universidade Estadual de Montes Claros (UNIMONTES). Av. Prof. Rui Braga, S/N - Vila Mauricéia, 39401-089, Montes Claros, MG, Brazil Universidade Estadual de Montes Claros Montes Claros Brazil.
Maria HołyńskaMuseum and Institute of Zoology Polish Academy of Sciences, Wilcza 64, 00-960 Warszawa, Poland Museum and Institute of Zoology Polish Academy of Sciences Warsaw Poland.
Federico MarroneDip.to STEBICEF. Università di Palermo. Via Archirafi 18. 90123, Palermo, Italy Università di Palermo Palermo Italy.
Luís José de Oliveira Geraldes-PrimeiroLaboratório de Plâncton, Coordenação de Biodiversidade, Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia (INPA), Av. André Araújo, 2936, 69060-000, Manaus, AM, Brazil Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia Manaus Brazil.
Edinaldo Nelson Dos Santos-SilvaLaboratório de Plâncton, Coordenação de Biodiversidade, Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia (INPA), Av. André Araújo, 2936, 69060-000, Manaus, AM, Brazil Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia Manaus Brazil.
Gilmar Perbiche-NevesLaboratório de Plâncton, Departamento de Hidrobiologia - CCBS, Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCar). Rodovia Washington Luís, Km 235 - CP 676, 13565-905, São Carlos, São Paulo, Brazil Universidade Federal de São Carlos São Carlos Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5025-2703
Carlos LópezEscuela de Acuicultura y Pesquería. Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias. Universidad Técnica de Manabí. Ciudadela Universitaria. Bahía de Caráquez. Manabí. Ecuador Universidad Técnica de Manabí Manabí Ecuador.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An annotated checklist of the free-living freshwater Copepoda recorded in different regions in Ecuador (including the Amazon, the Andes, the coastal region, and the Galapagos Islands) is here provided. We revised all published records, critically evaluated the validity of each taxon and provided short taxonomic and biogeographical remarks for each one. A total of 27 taxa have been reported, including species and records at the generic level only. The species and taxa identified only up to the generic level belong to five families and 14 genera. The Cyclopoida is the most diverse group with 16 records belonging to species (or identified to the generic level only) and eight genera, followed by the Harpacticoida with six species, one identification to the generic level only, and four genera, and Calanoida with four species belonging to two genera. A total of 18 taxa are recorded for the Andes. Six have been recorded in the Amazon, two are recorded for the coastal region, and six for the Galapagos. One species is shared between the Amazon and the Andes. One species is shared between the coastal region and the Amazon. Seventeen are only reported from the Andes and four are only reported from the Amazon. At the current status of the knowledge, any attempt to analyze and generalize distributional patterns of copepods in Ecuador is premature due to the scarcity of available information, and evidently there is an urgent need for more extensive field collections. A few working hypothesis for future studies are identified.

Indexed as

Biodiversityfreshwater Copepodageographical distributionNeotropicsspecies richness

Identifiers

PMID31435186
PMCPMC6700061

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.