Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31435163›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of gastroenterology2019

Miniature gastrointestinal endoscopy: Now and the future.

John J McGoran, Mark E McAlindon, Prasad G Iyer, Eric J Seibel, Rehan Haidry, Laurence B Lovat, Sarmed S Sami

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of gastroenterology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The evolution of lower gastrointestinal endoscopy: where are we now?Therapeutic advances in gastrointestinal endoscopy
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

John J McGoranDigestive Diseases Centre, Leicester Royal Infirmary, Leicester LE1 5WW, United Kingdom. jmcgoran01@qub.ac.uk.
Mark E McAlindonDepartment of Gastroenterology, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield S10 2JF, United Kingdom.
Prasad G IyerDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic Rochester, MN 55905, United States.
Eric J SeibelDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Washington, 4000 Mason St, Seattle, WA 98195, United States.
Rehan HaidryDivision of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, United Kingdom.
Laurence B LovatDivision of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, United Kingdom.
Sarmed S SamiDivision of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, United Kingdom.
University College London · GBMayo Clinic in Arizona · USRoyal Hallamshire Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since its original application, gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy has undergone many innovative transformations aimed at expanding the scope, safety, accuracy, acceptability and cost-effectiveness of this area of clinical practice. One method of achieving this has been to reduce the caliber of endoscopic devices. We propose the collective term "Miniature GI Endoscopy". In this Opinion Review, the innovations in this field are explored and discussed. The progress and clinical use of the three main areas of miniature GI endoscopy (ultrathin endoscopy, wireless endoscopy and scanning fiber endoscopy) are described. The opportunities presented by these technologies are set out in a clinical context, as are their current limitations. Many of the positive aspects of miniature endoscopy are clear, in that smaller devices provide access to potentially all of the alimentary canal, while conferring high patient acceptability. This must be balanced with the costs of new technologies and recognition of device specific challenges. Perspectives on future application are also considered and the efforts being made to bring new innovations to a clinical platform are outlined. Current devices demonstrate that miniature GI endoscopy has a valuable place in investigation of symptoms, therapeutic intervention and screening. Newer technologies give promise that the potential for enhancing the investigation and management of GI complaints is significant.

Indexed as

Biomedical TechnologyEndoscopy, GastrointestinalEquipment DesignGastrointestinal DiseasesHumansInventionsMass ScreeningMiniaturizationCapsule endoscopySingle fiber endoscopyUltrathin endoscopy

Identifiers

PMID31435163
PMCPMC6700702
OpenAlexW2969111408

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.