Trial reportScientific reports2019
Neuromuscular and biomechanical functions subserving finger dexterity in musicians.
Trial report in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.
- Exploring the longitudinal course of motor dexterity in first-episode psychosis: a 10-year follow-up.European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience · 2026Article
- Biomimetic Dexterous Hand Control for Robotic Piano Playing Using a Two-Stage Reinforcement Learning Curriculum.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Neuromuscular control of a five-finger pinch task is influenced by training history.Experimental brain research · 2025Article
- Explaining human motor coordination via the synergy expansion hypothesis.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- Portable Touchscreen Assessment of Motor Skill: A Registered Report of the Reliability and Validity of EDNA MoTap.Assessment · 2025Article
- Enhanced Somatosensory Inhibition Sharpens Hand Representation and Sensorimotor Skills in Pianists.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025Article
- Decomposition of a complex motor skill with precise error feedback and intensive training breaks expertise ceiling.Communications biology · 2025Article
- Optical Myography-Based Sensing Methodology of Application of Random Loads to Muscles during Hand-Gripping Training.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Active perceptual learning involves motor exploration and adaptation of predictive sensory integration.iScience · 2024Article
- Article
- Behavioral and physiological fatigue-related factors influencing timing and force control learning in pianists.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Higher synchronization stability with piano experience: relationship with finger and presentation modality.Journal of physiological anthropology · 2023Article
- Back to feedback: aberrant sensorimotor control in music performance under pressure.Communications biology · 2021Article
- Factors of choking under pressure in musicians.PloS one · 2021Article
- What is the significance of the traditional pinching mode of holding chopsticks?Journal of physiological anthropology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Exceptional finger dexterity enables skillful motor actions such as those required for musical performance. However, it has been not known whether and in what manner neuromuscular or biomechanical features of the fingers subserve the dexterity. We aimed to identify the features firstly differentiating the finger dexterity between trained and untrained individuals and secondly accounting for the individual differences in the dexterity across trained individuals. To this aim, two studies were conducted. The first study compared the finger dexterity and several neuromuscular and biomechanical characteristics of the fingers between pianists and non-musicians. As a measure of the dexterity, we used the maximum rate of repetitive finger movements. The results showed no differences in any biomechanical constraints of the fingers between the two groups (i.e. anatomical connectivity between the fingers and range of motion). However, the pianists exhibited faster finger movements and more independent control of movements between the fingers. These observations indicate expertise-dependent enhancement of the finger dexterity and reduction of neuromuscular constraints on movement independence between the fingers. The second study assessed individual differences in the finger dexterity between trained pianists. A penalized regression determined an association of the maximum movement speed of the fingers with both muscular strength and biomechanical characteristics of the fingers, but not with neuromuscular constraints of the fingers. None of these features covaried with measures of early and deliberate piano practice. These findings indicate that distinct biological factors of finger motor dexterity differentiate between the effects of piano practicing and individual differences across skilled pianists.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.