Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31434923›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

atlasBREX: Automated template-derived brain extraction in animal MRI.

Johannes Lohmeier, Takaaki Kaneko, Bernd Hamm, Marcus R Makowski, Hideyuki Okano

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Fibrin-targeting molecular MRI in inflammatory CNS disorders.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. A MRI-Based Toolbox for Neurosurgical Planning in Nonhuman Primates.Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE · 2020
    Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Johannes LohmeierCharité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Radiology, Berlin, Germany. johannes.lohmeier@charite.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8927-2453
Takaaki KanekoCenter for Brain Science Institute, RIKEN, Marmoset Neural Architecture, Wako-shi, Saitama, Japan.
Bernd HammCharité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Radiology, Berlin, Germany.
Marcus R MakowskiCharité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Radiology, Berlin, Germany.
Hideyuki OkanoCenter for Brain Science Institute, RIKEN, Marmoset Neural Architecture, Wako-shi, Saitama, Japan. hidokano@a2.keio.jp.
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEKeio University · JPRIKEN Center for Brain Science · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We proposed a generic template-derived approach for (semi-) automated brain extraction in animal MRI studies and evaluated our implementation with different animal models (macaque, marmoset, rodent) and MRI protocols (T1, T2). While conventional MR-neuroimaging studies perform brain extraction as an initial step priming subsequent image-registration from subject to template, our proposed approach propagates an anatomical template to (whole-head) individual subjects in reverse order, which is challenging due to the surrounding extracranial tissue, greater differences in contrast pattern and larger areas with field inhomogeneity. As a novel approach, the herein introduced brain extraction algorithm derives whole-brain segmentation using rigid and non-rigid deformation based on unbiased anatomical atlas building with a priori estimates from study-cohort and an initial approximate brain extraction. We evaluated our proposed method in comparison to several other technical approaches including "Marker based watershed scalper", "Brain-Extraction-Tool", "3dSkullStrip", "Primatologist-Toolbox", "Rapid Automatic Tissue Segmentation" and "Robust automatic rodent brain extraction using 3D pulse-coupled neural networks" with manual skull-stripping as reference standard. ABX demonstrated best performance with accurate (≥92%) and consistent results throughout datasets and across species, age and MRI protocols. ABX was made available to the public with documentation, templates and sample material ( https://www.github.com/jlohmeier/atlasBREX ).

Indexed as

AlgorithmsImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingNeuroimagingAnimalsBrainCallithrixMacaca mulatta

Identifiers

PMID31434923
PMCPMC6704255
OpenAlexW2969793540

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.