Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31434781›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2019

Study protocol for a randomised controlled trial with clinical, neurophysiological, laboratory and radiological outcome for surgical versus non-surgical treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis: the Uppsala Spinal Stenosis Trial (UppSten).

Konstantinos Pazarlis, Anna Punga, Nikos Schizas, Bengt Sandén, Karl Michaëlsson, Peter Försth

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03495661 (Uppsala Spinal Stenosis Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03495661 nacompletednot on this map

Uppsala Spinal Stenosis Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorUppsala UniversityRan2018 to 2021Enrolled156ConditionsSpinal Stenosis, Spinal Stenosis Lumbar, Degeneration Lumbar Spine, Degeneration SpineArmsDecompression
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Konstantinos PazarlisSpine Surgery Unit, Department of Orthopaedics, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden pazarlis.konstantinos@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-9305-0183
Anna PungaNeuroscience, Division of Clinical Neurophysiology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Nikos SchizasSpine Surgery Unit, Department of Orthopaedics, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden.
Bengt SandénSurgical Sciences, Division of Orthopaedics, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Karl MichaëlssonSurgical Sciences, Division of Orthopaedics, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-2815-1217
Peter FörsthSpine Surgery Unit, Department of Orthopaedics, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden.
Uppsala University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSymptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis is the most common indication for spinal surgery. However, more than one-third of the patients undergoing surgery for lumbar stenosis report dissatisfaction with the results. On the other hand, conservative treatment has shown positive results in some cases. This trial will compare the outcomes of surgical versus non-surgical treatment for lumbar stenosis. The study includes a multidimensional follow-up, aiming to study the association between outcome and other studied parameters, mainly electromyography and nerve conduction. Moreover, it may contribute to a better understanding of the pathophysiology of lumbar stenosis and to the development of future pharmacological treatments. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: UppSten is a single-centre randomised controlled trial in which 150 patients with symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis will be randomised into one of two treatment arms. The patients in the surgical arm will undergo laminectomy; the patients in the non-surgical arm will be given a structured physical training programme. The primary outcome of the study will be the Oswestry Disability Index. Secondary outcomes will include motor amplitude and degree of denervation activity obtained by means of nerve conduction studies and electromyography. Patient-reported outcome measures will be also used as secondary outcomes. Blood sample analysis and the investigation of potential inflammation markers are the additional secondary outcome parameters. Laboratory evaluation will include blood sample collection before the treatment initiation and after 6 months. Flavum ligament biopsies will be performed in the surgical group. Finally, tertiary outcomes will include neurophysiological measures, the objective walking ability and radiological evaluation. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study is approved by the Local Ethics Committee (Dnr 2017-506), the Hospital's Clinical Trials Committee (2018-0001) and the National Biobank Council and Uppsala Biobank (BbA-827-2018-025). The results will be presented in peer-reviewed journals and at international conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03495661.

Indexed as

Lumbar VertebraeDiagnostic Techniques, NeurologicalHumansRadiologyRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSpinal StenosisTreatment Outcomeflavum ligamentlaminectomylumbar spinal stenosisneurophysiologyphysical trainingsagittal balancespinal decompression

Identifiers

PMID31434781
PMCPMC6707759
OpenAlexW2969602973

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.