Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31434745›Full record

ArticlemSphere2019

Single-Strand Annealing Plays a Major Role in Double-Strand DNA Break Repair following CRISPR-Cas9 Cleavage in

Wen-Wei Zhang, Greg Matlashewski

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in mSphere, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. CRISPR-Cas9 precision editing of kinetochore protein phosphosite codons inFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Synthetic biology for combating leishmaniasis.Frontiers in microbiology · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. CRISPR-Cas9: Taming protozoan parasites with bacterial scissor.Journal of parasitic diseases : official organ of the Indian Society for Parasitology · 2022
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. The origin of unwanted editing byproducts in gene editing.Acta biochimica et biophysica Sinica · 2022
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Wen-Wei ZhangDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Greg MatlashewskiDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada greg.matlashewski@mcgill.ca.
McGill University · CA

Funding

CIHR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing relies on an efficient double-strand DNA break (DSB) and repair. Contrary to mammalian cells, the protozoan parasite

Indexed as

CRISPR-Cas SystemsDNA Breaks, Double-StrandedDNA RepairGenome, ProtozoanCRISPR-Associated Protein 9DNA, ProtozoanDNA, Single-StrandedGene EditingLeishmaniaRecombination, GeneticStaphylococcus aureusCRISPR-Associated Protein 9DNA, ProtozoanDNA, Single-StrandedCRISPR-Cas9DNA polymerase thetadouble-strand DNA break repairgene deletiongene targetingLeishmaniamicrohomology-mediated end joiningmiltefosine transporter genenonhomologous end joiningparasiteSaCas9single-strand annealing

Identifiers

PMID31434745
PMCPMC6706467
OpenAlexW2969520863

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.