ArticleSchizophrenia research2019
Evaluating visual neuroplasticity with EEG in schizophrenia outpatients.
Article in Schizophrenia research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Randomized controlled trial of the glycine transporter 1 inhibitor PF-03463275 to enhance cognitive training and neuroplasticity in schizophrenia.Schizophrenia research · 2023Trial
- A brief visual evoked potential (VEP) modulation assessment of experience-dependent plasticity recorded via wireless dry-EEG headset in Phase 1 clinical units.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Development of VEP-based biomarkers to assess plasticity states.Translational psychiatry · 2025Article
- Consumer-Grade Electroencephalogram and Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Neurofeedback Technologies for Mental Health and Wellbeing.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Sensory tetanisation to induce long-term-potentiation-like plasticity: A review and reassessment of the approach.The European journal of neuroscience · 2022Review
- Study on the diversity of mental states and neuroplasticity of the brain during human-machine interaction.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2022Article
- Evidence for Reduced Long-Term Potentiation-Like Visual Cortical Plasticity in Schizophrenia and Bipolar Disorder.Schizophrenia bulletin · 2021Article
- Using electrophysiological measures to evaluate the sense of presence in immersive virtual environments: An event-related potential study.Brain and behavior · 2021Article
- Visual cortical plasticity and the risk for psychosis: An interim analysis of the North American Prodrome Longitudinal Study.Schizophrenia research · 2021Article
- Multimodal Neuroimaging Study of Visual Plasticity in Schizophrenia.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2021Article
- Impaired Potentiation of Theta Oscillations During a Visual Cortical Plasticity Paradigm in Individuals With Schizophrenia.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Deficient neuroplasticity has been implicated in schizophrenia and can be examined with non-invasive methods in humans. High frequency visual stimulation (HFS) induces neuroplastic changes in visual evoked potential (VEP) components, similar to the tetanizing electrical stimulation that induces synaptic long-term potentiation (LTP). While visual HFS paradigms have been used in schizophrenia, the use of a single visual stimulus has precluded demonstration of whether the plasticity effects are specific to the stimulus presented during HFS (i.e., input specific). Additionally, test-retest reliability of VEP plasticity effects, an important consideration for applications of HFS paradigms in schizophrenia clinical trials, remains unknown. Accordingly, we administered a visual HFS paradigm to 38 schizophrenia patients and 27 healthy controls at baseline and two-weeks later. VEPs were elicited by horizontal and vertical line gratings before and after HFS; only one orientation was tetanized with HFS. Using a mass univariate permutation approach, we identified an input-specific cluster across groups that was broadly distributed over parietal-occipital areas between 108 and 183 ms. However, the groups did not differ in terms of the strength of plasticity effect. The test-retest reliability of the input-specific plasticity effect was modest over two weeks, suggesting that this HFS paradigm requires further development before it could be used to track plasticity change in clinical trials. Moreover, while the current HFS paradigm induced significant input-specific neuroplasticity, it did not replicate prior studies showing deficient neuroplasticity in schizophrenia. Accordingly, demonstration of deficient visual LTP-like neuroplasticity in schizophrenia may depend on paradigm parameters that remain to be fully elucidated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.