Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31434566›Full record

ArticleBMC evolutionary biology2019

Molecular phylogenetics of the African horseshoe bats (Chiroptera: Rhinolophidae): expanded geographic and taxonomic sampling of the Afrotropics.

Terrence C Demos, Paul W Webala, Steven M Goodman, Julian C Kerbis Peterhans, Michael Bartonjo, Bruce D Patterson

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC evolutionary biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
9.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Novel AfricanJournal of virology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Systematics of theJournal of mammalogy · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. What We Need to Consider During and After the SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic.Vector borne and zoonotic diseases (Larchmont, N.Y.) · 2020
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Molecular phylogenetics of slit-faced bats (Chiroptera: Nycteridae) reveal deeply divergent African lineages.Journal of zoological systematics and evolutionary research = Zeitschrift fur zoologische Systematik und Evolutionsforschung · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Terrence C DemosIntegrative Research Center, Field Museum of Natural History, Chicago, IL, 60605, USA. tdemos@fieldmuseum.org.ORCID 0000-0003-0522-3708
Paul W WebalaDepartment of Forestry and Wildlife Management, Maasai Mara University, Narok, Kenya.
Steven M GoodmanIntegrative Research Center, Field Museum of Natural History, Chicago, IL, 60605, USA.
Julian C Kerbis PeterhansIntegrative Research Center, Field Museum of Natural History, Chicago, IL, 60605, USA.
Michael BartonjoMammalogy Section, National Museums of Kenya, Nairobi, Kenya.
Bruce D PattersonIntegrative Research Center, Field Museum of Natural History, Chicago, IL, 60605, USA.
Field Museum of Natural History · USMaasai Mara University · KENational Museums of Kenya · KERoosevelt University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Old World insectivorous bat genus Rhinolophus is highly speciose. Over the last 15 years, the number of its recognized species has grown from 77 to 106, but knowledge of their interrelationships has not kept pace. Species limits and phylogenetic relationships of this morphologically conservative group remain problematic due both to poor sampling across the Afrotropics and to repeated instances of mitochondrial-nuclear discordance. Recent intensive surveys in East Africa and neighboring regions, coupled with parallel studies by others in West Africa and in Southern Africa, offer a new basis for understanding its evolutionary history.

resultsWe investigated phylogenetic relationships and intraspecific genetic variation in the Afro-Palearctic clade of Rhinolophidae using broad sampling. We sequenced mitochondrial cytochrome-b (1140 bp) and four independent and informative nuclear introns (2611 bp) for 213 individuals and incorporated sequence data from 210 additional individuals on GenBank that together represent 24 of the 33 currently recognized Afrotropical Rhinolophus species. We addressed the widespread occurrence of mito-nuclear discordance in Rhinolophus by inferring concatenated and species tree phylogenies using only the nuclear data. Well resolved mitochondrial, concatenated nuclear, and species trees revealed phylogenetic relationships and population structure of the Afrotropical species and species groups.

conclusionsMultiple well-supported and deeply divergent lineages were resolved in each of the six African Rhinolophus species groups analyzed, suggesting as many as 12 undescribed cryptic species; these include several instances of sympatry among close relatives. Coalescent lineage delimitation offered support for new undescribed lineages in four of the six African groups in this study. On the other hand, two to five currently recognized species may be invalid based on combined mitochondrial and/or nuclear phylogenetic analyses. Validation of these cryptic lineages as species and formal relegation of current names to synonymy will require integrative taxonomic assessments involving morphology, ecology, acoustics, distribution, and behavior. The resulting phylogenetic framework offers a powerful basis for addressing questions regarding their ecology and evolution.

Indexed as

PhylogenyAfricaAnimalsCell NucleusChiropteraCytochromes bDNA, MitochondrialIntronsSympatryCytochromes bDNA, MitochondrialAfrotropical biodiversityEast AfricaIntrogressionIntronsPhylogenyRhinolophusSpecies treeTaxonomy

Identifiers

PMID31434566
PMCPMC6704657
OpenAlexW2969824895

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.