Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31434270›Full record

ReviewAntioxidants (Basel, Switzerland)2019

Antioxidant Regulation of Cell Reprogramming.

Yuichiro J Suzuki, Nataliia V Shults

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yuichiro J SuzukiDepartment of Pharmacology and Physiology, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC 20007, USA. ys82@georgetown.edu.
Nataliia V ShultsDepartment of Pharmacology and Physiology, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC 20007, USA.
Georgetown University · USGeorgetown University Medical Center · US

Funding

Mechanism of apoptosis in lung vascular smooth muscleR01HL072844 · NHLBI · TUFTS UNIVERSITY BOSTON · PI SUZUKI, YUICHIRO JUSTIN · 2003 to 2017
$3.3M
New mechanism of cellular protein oxidationR21AI142649 · NIAID · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI SUZUKI, YUICHIRO JUSTIN · 2019 to 2020
$428k
Oxidant-mediated amino acid conversions in alcohol abuseR03AA026516 · NIAAA · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI SUZUKI, YUICHIRO JUSTIN · 2019 to 2020
$156k
Endogenous protein engineering mechanismof oxidative stress in Alzheimer's diseaseR03AG059554 · NIA · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI SUZUKI, YUICHIRO JUSTIN · 2018 to 2019
$156k
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL072844NIAAA NIH HHS R03 AA026516NIAID NIH HHS R21 AI142649NIA NIH HHS R03 AG059554NIH HHS R01HL072844, R21AI142649, R03AG059554, and R03AA026516
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Discovery of induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) has revolutionized regeneration biology, providing further mechanistic insights and possible therapeutic applications. The original discovery by Yamanaka and co-workers showed that the expression of four transcription factors in fibroblasts resulted in the generation of iPSCs that can be differentiated into various cell types. This technology should be particularly useful for restoring cells with limited proliferative capacities such as adult heart muscle cells and neurons, in order to treat diseases affecting these cell types. More recently, iPSCs-mediated cell reprogramming has advanced to new technologies including direct reprogramming and pharmacological reprogramming. Direct reprogramming allows for the conversion of fibroblasts into cardiomyocytes, neurons or other cells by expressing multiple cell type-specific transcription factors without going through the production of iPSCs. Both iPSC-mediated reprogramming as well as direct reprogramming can also be promoted by a combination of small molecules, opening up a possibility for pharmacological therapies to induce cell reprogramming. However, all of these processes have been shown to be affected by reactive oxygen species that reduce the efficacies of reprogramming fibroblasts into iPSCs, differentiating iPSCs into target cells, as well as direct reprogramming. Accordingly, antioxidants have been shown to support these reprogramming processes and this review article summarizes these findings. It should be noted however, that the actions of antioxidants to support cell reprogramming may be through their ROS inhibiting abilities, but could also be due to mechanisms that are independent of classical antioxidant actions.

Indexed as

antioxidantspluripotencyreactive oxygen speciesreprogrammingstem cells

Identifiers

PMID31434270
PMCPMC6721077
OpenAlexW2969477255

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.