ArticlePLoS computational biology2019
Identifying nonlinear dynamical systems via generative recurrent neural networks with applications to fMRI.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mapping Whole-Brain Nonlinear Structure-Function Dynamics in Aging via Neural Granger Causality.Brain topography · 2026Article
- Data-Constrained Recurrent Network Neural Model Uncovers the Circuit Mechanism of Olfactory OFF Responses.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- A Deep Learning Framework for Spatiotemporal Modeling of Visual Task fMRI.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Linearizing and Forecasting: A Reservoir Computing Route to Digital Twins of the Brain.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Universal Approximation Theorems for Dynamical Systems with Infinite-Time Horizon Guarantees.ArXiv · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence as a surrogate brain: bridging neural dynamical models and data.National science review · 2026Review
- Dynamic graph vector autoregression for characterizing cardiac electromechanical dynamics during incremental exercise from the joint phase space of electrocardiogram and phonocardiogram.Frontiers in physiology · 2026Article
- When predict can also explain: Few-shot prediction to select better neural latents.PLoS computational biology · 2025Article
- Understanding Brain Functional Dynamics Through Neural Koopman Operator With Control Mechanism.IEEE transactions on medical imaging · 2025Article
- Using an ordinary differential equation model to separate rest and task signals in fMRI.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Article
- Machine Learning-Based Prediction of Feed Conversion Ratio: A Feasibility Study of Using Short-Term FCR Data for Long-Term Feed Conversion Ratio (FCR) Prediction.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
- Neuromodulation of Cerebral Blood Flow: A Physiological Mechanism and Methodological Review of Neurovascular Coupling.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Computation-through-Dynamics Benchmark: Simulated datasets and quality metrics for dynamical models of neural activity.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- POCO: Scalable Neural Forecasting through Population Conditioning.Advances in neural information processing systems · 2025Article
- Kalman contrastive unsupervised representation learning.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Characterizing the dynamics, reactivity and controllability of moods in depression with a Kalman filter.PLoS computational biology · 2024Article
- Quantifying brain-functional dynamics using deep dynamical systems: Technical considerations.iScience · 2024Article
- Parameter estimation in a whole-brain network model of epilepsy: Comparison of parallel global optimization solvers.PLoS computational biology · 2024Article
- Reconstructing computational system dynamics from neural data with recurrent neural networks.Nature reviews. Neuroscience · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A major tenet in theoretical neuroscience is that cognitive and behavioral processes are ultimately implemented in terms of the neural system dynamics. Accordingly, a major aim for the analysis of neurophysiological measurements should lie in the identification of the computational dynamics underlying task processing. Here we advance a state space model (SSM) based on generative piecewise-linear recurrent neural networks (PLRNN) to assess dynamics from neuroimaging data. In contrast to many other nonlinear time series models which have been proposed for reconstructing latent dynamics, our model is easily interpretable in neural terms, amenable to systematic dynamical systems analysis of the resulting set of equations, and can straightforwardly be transformed into an equivalent continuous-time dynamical system. The major contributions of this paper are the introduction of a new observation model suitable for functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) coupled to the latent PLRNN, an efficient stepwise training procedure that forces the latent model to capture the 'true' underlying dynamics rather than just fitting (or predicting) the observations, and of an empirical measure based on the Kullback-Leibler divergence to evaluate from empirical time series how well this goal of approximating the underlying dynamics has been achieved. We validate and illustrate the power of our approach on simulated 'ground-truth' dynamical systems as well as on experimental fMRI time series, and demonstrate that the learnt dynamics harbors task-related nonlinear structure that a linear dynamical model fails to capture. Given that fMRI is one of the most common techniques for measuring brain activity non-invasively in human subjects, this approach may provide a novel step toward analyzing aberrant (nonlinear) dynamics for clinical assessment or neuroscientific research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.