Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31433316›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in nephrology and hypertension2019

In-vivo techniques for determining nephron number.

Aleksandar Denic, Hisham Elsherbiny, Andrew D Rule

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in nephrology and hypertension, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Are noninvasive measurements of nephron number achievable in humans?Current opinion in nephrology and hypertension · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Mice with aAmerican journal of physiology. Renal physiology · 2024
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Renal MRI: From Nephron to NMR Signal.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2023
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. The Validity of Benchmark Dose Limit Analysis for Estimating Permissible Accumulation of Cadmium.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Assessment of nephron number and single-nephron glomerular filtration rate in a clinical setting.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2021
    Review
  18. New imaging tools to measure nephron numberJournal of developmental origins of health and disease · 2021
    Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Aleksandar DenicDivision of Nephrology and Hypertension.
Hisham ElsherbinyDivision of Nephrology and Hypertension.
Andrew D RuleDivision of Nephrology and Hypertension.

Funding

The macro- and micro- anatomy and pathology of the aging kidneyR01DK090358 · NIDDK · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI ANDREW David RULE · 2011 to 2026
$9.9M
NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK090358
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewMany studies have suggested low nephron endowment at birth contributes to the risk of developing hypertension and chronic kidney disease (CKD) later in life. Loss of nephrons with age and disease is largely a subclinical process. New technologies are needed to count nephrons as glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is a poor surrogate for nephron number. RECENT

findingsCortical volume, glomerular density, and percent globally sclerotic glomeruli are imperfect surrogates for nephron number. The disector-fractionator method is the most accurate method to count nephrons but is limited to autopsy settings. Glomerular density combined with kidney imaging and ultrafiltration coefficient-based methods require a kidney biopsy, and have been applied in living humans (kidney donors). Low nephron number predicts a higher postdonation urine albumin. Contrast-enhanced MRI has detected glomeruli without a biopsy, but so far, not in living humans. SUMMARY: Currently, there is no accurate and well tolerated method for determining nephron number in living humans. A clinically useful method may allow GFR to be replaced by its more relevant determinants: nephron number and single nephron GFR. This could revolutionize nephrology by separating the measurement of chronic disease (nephron loss) from more reversible hemodynamic effects (nephron hyperfiltration/hypofiltration).

Indexed as

BiopsyGlomerular Filtration RateHumansKidneyKidney GlomerulusMagnetic Resonance ImagingNephrons

Identifiers

PMID31433316
PMCPMC7367693

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.