Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31433108›Full record

Trial reportJournal of midwifery & women's health2019

Randomized Trial of 3 Techniques of Perineal Skin Closure During Second-Degree Perineal Laceration Repair.

Carolyn W Swenson, Lisa Kane Low, Katherine M Kowalk, Dee E Fenner

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of midwifery & women's health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07383623 (THE EFFECT OF STAPLER VERSUS SKIN SUTURING ON PAIN AND WOUND HEALING AFTER EPISIOTOMY REPAIR IN PRIMIPAROUS WOMEN), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07383623 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

The effect of stapler versus skin suturing on pain and wound healing after episiotomy repair in primiparous women: a randomized controlled trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorAyşegül KanıkRan2025 to 2026Enrolled24ConditionsEpisiotomyArmsstapler skin closure, absorbable suture group
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. High-rebound sponge as a simulation tool for perineal suture.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Carolyn W SwensonDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3220-9445
Lisa Kane LowDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Katherine M KowalkDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Dee E FennerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
University of Michigan · US

Funding

University of Michigan WRHR Career Development ProgramK12HD065257 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI FENNER, DEE ELLEN · 2010 to 2019
$3.4M
NICHD NIH HHS K12 HD065257
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPerineal lacerations during childbirth are common, and suturing the perineal skin during repair has been associated with increased postpartum pain. This study sought to test the hypothesis that no difference in postpartum perineal pain exists between 3 methods of skin closure for second-degree repair: suture, no suture, and surgical glue.

methodsA single-blind randomized controlled trial of women after vaginal birth who had a second-degree perineal laceration was conducted at a tertiary care teaching hospital from August 2014 to April 2017. Women were randomized to perineal skin closure with suture, no suture, or surgical glue using a 1:1:1 allocation. Pain was assessed using the short-form McGill Pain Questionnaire, a 100-mm visual analog scale (VAS), and Present Pain Index (PPI) at one day, 2 weeks, 6 weeks, and 3 months postpartum. Wound healing was assessed at 6 weeks using the Redness, Edema, Ecchymosis, Drainage, Approximation (REEDA) scale. Pain scores were compared across groups using a chi-square test, Mann-Whitney U test, or analysis of variance where appropriate.

resultsA total of 35 women were randomized: 14 received suture, 11 had no suture, and 10 received surgical glue for perineal skin repair. Demographic characteristics were similar between groups. At 2 weeks postpartum, women with suture had higher median pain scores on the short-form McGill Pain Questionnaire (15.0 suture vs 2.0 glue vs 2.0 no suture, P = .03) and VAS (50.0 suture vs 3.0 glue vs 7.0 no suture, P = .02). Significant differences in pain were not seen on the PPI. At 3 months, women in the suture group had higher median pain scores on the short-form McGill Pain Questionnaire compared with surgical glue (1.0 vs 0, P = .04). Wound healing was similar across groups (REEDA score: 0 suture vs 1.0 no suture, vs 0 surgical glue, P = .24). DISCUSSION: Compared with no suture and surgical glue, suturing the perineal skin was associated with the highest postpartum pain scores.

Indexed as

SuturesTissue AdhesivesAdultDelivery, ObstetricFemaleHumansLacerationsPain MeasurementPerineumPregnancySingle-Blind MethodWound HealingTissue Adhesivesadhesiveslacerationspainperineumpostpartum periodsutures

Identifiers

PMID31433108
PMCPMC7747225
OpenAlexW2969478315

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.