Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31432913›Full record

ArticleRevista de saude publica2019

Adapted version of the Pubertal Development Scale for use in Brazil.

Sabine Pompéia, Gislaine de Almeida Valverde Zanini, Rafaella Sales de Freitas, Luanna Maristella Cabanal Inacio, Flávia Calanca da Silva, Giovana Ribeiro de Souza, Maria Sylvia de Souza Vitalle, Sheila Rejane Niskier, Hugo Cogo-Moreira

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Revista de saude publica, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Testosterone-to-estradiol ratio and lung function in a prospective study of Puerto Rican youth.Annals of allergy, asthma & immunology : official publication of the American College of Allergy, Asthma, & Immunology · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Sabine PompéiaUniversidade Federal de São Paulo. Departamento de Psicobiologia. São Paulo, SP, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5208-8003
Gislaine de Almeida Valverde ZaniniUniversidade Federal de São Paulo. Programa de Pós-Graduação em Psicobiologia. São Paulo, SP, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6794-3044
Rafaella Sales de FreitasUniversidade Federal de São Paulo. Programa de Pós-Graduação em Psicobiologia. São Paulo, SP, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0155-8351
Luanna Maristella Cabanal InacioUniversidade Federal de São Paulo. Departamento de Psicobiologia. São Paulo, SP, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1642-7546
Flávia Calanca da SilvaUniversidade Federal de São Paulo. Programa de Pós-Graduação em Saúde Coletiva. São Paulo, SP, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1489-5127
Giovana Ribeiro de SouzaUniversidade Federal de São Paulo. Setor de Medicina do Adolescente. Departamento de Pediatria. São Paulo, SP, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7060-9696
Maria Sylvia de Souza VitalleUniversidade Federal de São Paulo. Programa de Pós-Graduação em Saúde Coletiva. São Paulo, SP, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9405-4250
Sheila Rejane NiskierUniversidade Federal de São Paulo. Setor de Medicina do Adolescente. Departamento de Pediatria. São Paulo, SP, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5017-4680
Hugo Cogo-MoreiraUniversidade Federal de São Paulo. Departamento de Psiquiatria. São Paulo, SP, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9411-9237

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo determine whether scores in an adapted version of the self-assessment Pubertal Development Scale into Portuguese match those from the gold standard in pubertal development (Tanner scale).

methodsThis was a cross-sectional study with a convenience sample of 133 children and adolescents aged nine to 17 years (59 males; mean age of 13 years and six months, with standard deviation = 25 months). Youngsters completed the Pubertal Development Scale and were then examined by specialists in adolescent medicine.

resultsExact absolute agreement of pubertal stages were modest, but significant associations between measures (correlation; intra-class correlation coefficients of consistency) showed that the Pubertal Development Scale adequately measures changes that map onto pubertal development determined by physical examination, on par with international publications. Furthermore, scores obtained from each Pubertal Development Scale question reflected adequate gonadal and adrenal events assessed by clinical ratings, mostly with medium/high effect sizes. Latent factors obtained from scores on all Pubertal Development Scale questions had excellent fit indices in Confirmatory Factor Analyses and correlated with Tanner staging.

conclusionsWe conclude that self-assessment of body changes by youngsters using the Portuguese version of the Pubertal Development Scale is useful when estimates of pubertal progression are sufficient, and exact agreement with clinical staging is not necessary. The Pubertal Development Scale is, therefore, a reliable instrument for use in large-scale studies in Brazil that aim at investigating adolescent health related to pubertal developmental. The translated version and scoring systems are provided.

Indexed as

Surveys and QuestionnairesTranslatingAdolescentAdolescent DevelopmentBrazilChildCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleReproducibility of ResultsSelf-AssessmentSexual Maturation

Identifiers

PMID31432913
PMCPMC6703897

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.